Study Stopped
The study was stopped, as the another multicentre-RCT on the same patients started.
Work Related Rehabilitation in Patients With Low Back Pain
A Study on the Effect of Employment Follow-up on Return to Work in Sick Listed Patients With Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low back pain is a usual conditions in the western countries and several treatments available for patients with "non-specific low back pain". According to the European guidelines are exercise and cognitive intervention effective on pain and function(www.backpaineurope.org), but it have no documented effect on return to work. In addition, there is no documentation that treatments which focus on a single treatment, is effective with regard to return to work for sick-listed patients. The challenges for health personnel is not cure of the patients back pain, but to build up rehabilitation programs which focus on disability and work incapacity, in patients which are at risk of loosing their work. Dr. P. Loisel, Montreal, Canada", has since 1995 treated patients with back pain according to the "The PREVICAP model - (PREVention of work handICAP)", where the main purpose with work-related program is to prevent prolonged disability and to help patients back to work. Loisel demonstrated that the PREVICAP models accelerated the "return to work" factor by a factor 2.4 (p=0.01). The PREVICAP model have also been evaluated in Amsterdam, by Dr. Anema with the same results. At the Back Clinic, Ullevål University Hospital we have evaluated several exercise programs with good effect on pain and function, but not on the return to work rate. We are planning to do a randomized controlled trial after the PREVICAP model. All included patients in both groups, will have an clinical examination by specialist in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and an exercise program. Patients will be randomized to a work-related rehabilitations program or to usual care by the general practitioner. Hypothesis Main hypothesis: Sick-listed patients with back pain, who will be randomized to the work-related rehabilitation programs, will return to work faster than patients randomized to usual care by the general practitioner. Second hypothesis: A cost-benefit analysis will favor the exercise program and work place intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 low-back-pain
Started Jan 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_3 low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedJuly 6, 2011
December 1, 2008
3.7 years
September 6, 2007
July 3, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome measure is return to work, measured in number of days patients have been sick listed in both groups.
The duration of the project is estimated to 3 years. The project will start January1st 2008 and the inclusion of patients and the follow-up will be in 2008 and 2009. In 2010 follow-up, statistical analyses, writing and publishing the articles.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary outcome measures are improvement in pain, function, stiffness and fear-avoidance beliefs
The duration of the project is estimated to 3 years. The project will start January 1st 2008 and the inclusion of patients and the follow-up will be in 2008 and 2009. In 2010 follow-up, statistical analyses, writing and publishing the articles.
Study Arms (1)
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will have an clinical examination and exercise and then return to general practitioner, which will take decision about sick leave or return to work.
Interventions
The workplace intervention includes two steps: Evaluations of the work site: The occupational ergonomists task is to identify conditions at the work site, as for instance ergonomic, work demand and relations to the employer and colleagues. Therapeutic Return to work: The occupational ergonomists will organize contacts and meetings between the employer and the patients and make a schedule for return to work. The therapeutic return-to-work-process will take place at the work place, with progressively more days at work and progressively increasing tasks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with non-specific low back pain sick listed from 6-8 weeks and who are permanently employed.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with infection, tumors, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory disorder, radicular syndrome or cauda equina syndrome, spinal stenosis or spondylolysis/ listesis, serious somatic disease and/or psychic disease and patients with a poor proficiency in Norwegian.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Anne Keller
Oslo, Oslo County, 0407, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne Keller, Dr.Med.Sc
Dep of Physical Medicine and Rehab, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2007
First Posted
September 10, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 6, 2011
Record last verified: 2008-12