The Effectiveness of Behavioral Graded Activity in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip and/or Knee
GRADIT
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We performed a randomized controlled trial to study the effectiveness of Behavioral graded activity (BGA) in patients with OA of the hip or knee. It was hypothesised that in the long term BGA results in less pain, less limitations in activities, and better patient global assessment (i.e. the effect of treatment perceived by patients themselves), compared to usual care of physiotherapists (UC). UC was operationalized as physiotherapeutic care according to the Dutch physiotherapy guideline for patients with hip and/or knee OA. It was also investigated whether specific subgroups of patients benefited more from BGA and which factors influenced the success of BGA-treatment. Also, it will be investigated whether differences exist in exercise adherence and whether there is a relationship between exercise adherence and long-term effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2001
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedAugust 29, 2007
August 1, 2007
August 28, 2007
August 28, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain
week 0, 13, 39 and 65
Physical function
week 0, 13, 39 and 65
Patient global assessment
week 13, 39 and 65
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Tiredness
week 0, 13, 39 and 65
Stiffness
week 0, 13, 39 and 65
Joint mobility
week 0, 13, and 65
Muscle strength
week 0, 13, and 65
Patient-specific physical function
week 0, 13, 39 and 65
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALBehavioral graded activity
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORExercise therapy
Interventions
The intervention is directed at increasing the level of activities in a time-contingent way, with the goal to integrate these activities in the daily living of the patients. The intervention is performed by physical therapists in primary care, on individual basis. Treatment period of maximal 12 weeks (with maximal 18 sessions), followed by 5 pre-set boostermoments with a maximum of 7 sessions (respectively in week 18, 25, 34, 42, and 55).
Treatment according to the Dutch physiotherapy guideline for patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. This guideline consists of general recommendations, emphasizing provision of information and advice, exercise therapy, and encouragement of a positive coping with the complaints. The treatment consisted of a maximum of 18 sessions within a period of 12 weeks. The treatment could be discontinued within the 12 week period if, according to the physiotherapists, all treatment goals were achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Osteoarthritis of hip or knee according to the clinical criteria of the American College of Rheumatology
You may not qualify if:
- other pathology explaining the complaints;
- complaints in less than 10 out of 30 days;
- treatment for these complaints with exercise therapy in the preceding six months;
- under 50 or over 80 years of age;
- indication for hip or knee replacement within one year;
- contraindication for exercise therapy;
- inability to understand the Dutch language;
- a high level of physical function (since patients who perform at a high level of physical function at baseline do not need to increase their level of physical function. A high level of physical function was operationalized on a score of less than two on the sections walking ability and physical function of the Algofunctional index)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Netherlands Instititute for Health Services Researchlead
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmccollaborator
- UMC Utrechtcollaborator
- Maastricht Universitycollaborator
- Radboud University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
NIVEL
Utrecht, 3500 BN, Netherlands
Related Publications (6)
Veenhof C, Koke AJ, Dekker J, Oostendorp RA, Bijlsma JW, van Tulder MW, van den Ende CH. Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee: A randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec 15;55(6):925-34. doi: 10.1002/art.22341.
PMID: 17139639RESULTVeenhof C, van Hasselt TJ, Koke AJ, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW, van den Ende CH. Active involvement and long-term goals influence long-term adherence to behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis: a qualitative study. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(4):273-8. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70007-1.
PMID: 17132122RESULTCoupe VM, Veenhof C, van Tulder MW, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW, Van den Ende CH. The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Feb;66(2):215-21. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.054478. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
PMID: 16880195RESULTVeenhof C, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW, van den Ende CH. Influence of various recruitment strategies on the study population and outcome of a randomized controlled trial involving patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jun 15;53(3):375-82. doi: 10.1002/art.21171.
PMID: 15934129RESULTPisters MF, Veenhof C, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG, Dekker J. Behavioural graded activity results in better exercise adherence and more physical activity than usual care in people with osteoarthritis: a cluster-randomised trial. J Physiother. 2010;56(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70053-9.
PMID: 20500136DERIVEDPisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, De Bakker DH, Dekker J. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized controlled trial comparing two different physical therapy interventions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Aug;18(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 May 19.
PMID: 20488250DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joost Dekker, PhD
VU Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johannes WJ Bijlsma, PhD, MD
UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cindy Veenhof, PhD
NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cornelia HM van den Ende, PhD
St Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martijn FP Pisters, MSc
NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2007
First Posted
August 29, 2007
Study Start
May 1, 2001
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
August 29, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-08