Evaluation of Topical Lidocaine Spray as Adjuvant to Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is some controversy in the medical literature regarding the effectiveness of topical lidocaine in children as an adjuvant drug to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In children, deep sedation and general anesthesia are often used to sedate children submitting to this procedure. Propofol is an anesthetic drug increasingly popular in this situation, but this drug can only be used with an anesthesiologist in Brazil. Its main side effects include hypotension, respiratory depression and local pain. Lidocaine is frequently used as premedication, and the rationale is that lowering patient discomfort could lower the required dose to achieve the endoscopy and reduce potential side effects. Nevertheless, some patients perceive this medication as uncomfortable. This study aims to compare sedative drug doses between patients who were given either placebo or topical lidocaine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedMay 23, 2008
May 1, 2008
August 24, 2007
May 22, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
propofol dose required to achieve adequate sedation to upper digestive endoscopy
one hour
Secondary Outcomes (3)
incidence of tachycardia (heart rate > 120) during the procedure
one hour
incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 94%) during procedure
one hour
severity of sore throat after the procedure
up to 2 hours
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALgroup treated
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORcontrol group
Interventions
oral cavity and throat were sprayed with lidocaine 10% two to three puffs before propofol infusing
oral cavity and throat were sprayed with placebo (tannic acid 0.5%) two to three puffs before propofol infusing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children and adolescents submitting to upper digestive endoscopy with weight above 30 kg and age between 8 and 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological disorders
- Psychiatric disorders
- Specific contra-indication to lidocaine
- Specific contra-indication to propofol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Infantil Cândido Fontoura
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04042-004, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rodrigo S Machado, PhD
UNIFESP/EPM
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2007
First Posted
August 28, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 23, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-05