NCT00521703

Brief Summary

There is some controversy in the medical literature regarding the effectiveness of topical lidocaine in children as an adjuvant drug to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In children, deep sedation and general anesthesia are often used to sedate children submitting to this procedure. Propofol is an anesthetic drug increasingly popular in this situation, but this drug can only be used with an anesthesiologist in Brazil. Its main side effects include hypotension, respiratory depression and local pain. Lidocaine is frequently used as premedication, and the rationale is that lowering patient discomfort could lower the required dose to achieve the endoscopy and reduce potential side effects. Nevertheless, some patients perceive this medication as uncomfortable. This study aims to compare sedative drug doses between patients who were given either placebo or topical lidocaine.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2007

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2008

Status Verified

May 1, 2008

First QC Date

August 24, 2007

Last Update Submit

May 22, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

endoscopy, gastrointestinallidocainepropofolchildadolescent

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • propofol dose required to achieve adequate sedation to upper digestive endoscopy

    one hour

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • incidence of tachycardia (heart rate > 120) during the procedure

    one hour

  • incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 94%) during procedure

    one hour

  • severity of sore throat after the procedure

    up to 2 hours

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

group treated

Drug: Lidocaine

2

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

control group

Drug: Tannic acid

Interventions

oral cavity and throat were sprayed with lidocaine 10% two to three puffs before propofol infusing

1

oral cavity and throat were sprayed with placebo (tannic acid 0.5%) two to three puffs before propofol infusing

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Children and adolescents submitting to upper digestive endoscopy with weight above 30 kg and age between 8 and 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological disorders
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Specific contra-indication to lidocaine
  • Specific contra-indication to propofol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Infantil Cândido Fontoura

São Paulo, São Paulo, 04042-004, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DyspepsiaMalabsorption SyndromesGastroesophageal RefluxAbdominal Pain

Interventions

Lidocainetannic acid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEsophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesPainNeurologic Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • Rodrigo S Machado, PhD

    UNIFESP/EPM

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2007

First Posted

August 28, 2007

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Study Completion

April 1, 2008

Last Updated

May 23, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-05

Locations