NCT00510627

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients treated with Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) in conjunction with chemotherapy have a better overall survival rate than patients treated with chemotherapy alone.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2007

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

First QC Date

July 31, 2007

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Metastatic Liver CancerColorectal CancerRadiofrequency AblationChemotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To evaluate Overall Survival in subjects receiving chemotherapy + RFA compared to chemotherapy alone.

    Study duration

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To evaluate any unanticipated adverse device effects.

    Two years

  • To determine if there are differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events in the RFA + chemotherapy arm compared to the chemotherapy only arm.

    Study duration

Study Arms (2)

A

EXPERIMENTAL

Radiofrequency ablation in conjunction with chemotherapy

Device: Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard of care chemotherapy regimen

Drug: Chemotherapy

Interventions

The RF3000 radiofrequency generator has the capacity to deliver 200 watts of alternating current to the needle electrode for the coagulation necrosis of soft tissue.

Also known as: RF3000 Radiofrequency (RF) Generators, LeVeen Electrode, Co-Access Electrode, Soloist Electrode, SuperSlim Electrode
A

Standard of care chemotherapy regimen

Also known as: Oxaliplatin containing chemotherapy regimen, Irinotecan containing chemotherapy regimen, An anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-containing regimen, Other
B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All subjects must meet the following criteria:
  • Subject must have incurable metastatic colorectal cancer with metastatic disease to the liver
  • Subject must have extrahepatic metastatic disease, as confirmed by radiographic evidence or surgical/other documentation that cannot be treated by surgery or image guided therapy to an endpoint of no evidence of residual disease by imaging criteria
  • Subject has received and, in the opinion of the treating physician, progressed through at least one prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease, or has developed recurrent disease on or within 6 months of completing adjuvant therapy
  • At least 50% of the total tumor burden is in the liver, as determined by the treating investigator, and prior to any study specified intervention (resection or ablation).
  • Subject must have no more than 10 hepatic tumors remaining after surgical resection, with no tumor exhibiting a unidimensional size greater than 5cm
  • Subject is medically eligible to receive RFA, as determined by the treating investigator
  • Subject is naïve to, and medically eligible (as defined by the treating investigator) to receive, at least one of the following:
  • an oxaliplatin containing regimen
  • an irinotecan containing regimen
  • an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-containing regimen (subject must be naïve to both cetuximab and panitumumab)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 or 1
  • Age \> 18 years
  • Subject life expectancy \> 3 months
  • International Normalized Ratio (INR) \< 2.0
  • +4 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • All subjects who meet any of the following criteria will not be enrolled into the study:
  • Subjects's extrahepatic disease is amenable to curative surgical or image guided therapy
  • Subject has known brain metastases
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy
  • Subject is pregnant, nursing, or wishes to become pregnant during the study
  • Other serious medical condition(s) (e.g. uncontrolled infection, uncontrolled cardiac disease) that, in the opinion of the treating investigator, would preclude study treatment or impact survival.
  • Current or planned treatment with any experimental chemotherapy or biological agents

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

New York University

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Chapter 49, Colon, Rectal, and Anal Cancers. PART VI: THE CARE OF INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIFIC CANCERS; pp: 1156-1214

    BACKGROUND
  • Choti MA, Bulkley GB. Management of hepatic metastases. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999 Jan;5(1):65-80. doi: 10.1002/lt.500050113.

    PMID: 9873095BACKGROUND
  • Cromheecke M, de Jong KP, Hoekstra HJ. Current treatment for colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Oct;25(5):451-63. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0679.

    PMID: 10527592BACKGROUND
  • Kemeny NE, Atiq OT. Non-surgical treatment for liver metastases. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 1999 Dec;13(4):593-610. doi: 10.1053/bega.1999.0050.

    PMID: 10654922BACKGROUND
  • Fong Y. Surgical therapy of hepatic colorectal metastasis. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999 Jul-Aug;49(4):231-55. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.49.4.231.

    PMID: 11198884BACKGROUND
  • Bowles BJ, Machi J, Limm WM, Severino R, Oishi AJ, Furumoto NL, Wong LL, Oishi RH. Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency thermal ablation in advanced liver tumors. Arch Surg. 2001 Aug;136(8):864-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.8.864.

    PMID: 11485520BACKGROUND
  • Berber E, Pelley R, Siperstein AE. Predictors of survival after radiofrequency thermal ablation of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1358-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.039. Epub 2005 Jan 31.

    PMID: 15684312BACKGROUND
  • Yoon SS, Tanabe KK. Surgical treatment and other regional treatments for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Oncologist. 1999;4(3):197-208.

    PMID: 10394588BACKGROUND
  • DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Surgical treatment of malignant liver tumours. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 1999 Dec;13(4):557-74. doi: 10.1053/bega.1999.0048.

    PMID: 10654920BACKGROUND
  • Curley SA, Vecchio R. New trends in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Tumori. 1998 May-Jun;84(3):281-8. doi: 10.1177/030089169808400301.

    PMID: 9678609BACKGROUND
  • Dodd GD 3rd, Soulen MC, Kane RA, Livraghi T, Lees WR, Yamashita Y, Gillams AR, Karahan OI, Rhim H. Minimally invasive treatment of malignant hepatic tumors: at the threshold of a major breakthrough. Radiographics. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):9-27. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.1.g00ja019.

    PMID: 10682768BACKGROUND
  • Poston GJ. Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: where are we really going? J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1342-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.911. Epub 2005 Jan 31. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15684315BACKGROUND
  • Pawlik TM, Abdalla EK, Ellis LM, Vauthey JN, Curley SA. Debunking dogma: surgery for four or more colorectal liver metastases is justified. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Feb;10(2):240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.027.

    PMID: 16455457BACKGROUND
  • Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, Lledo G, Flesh M, Mery-Mignard D, Quinaux E, Couteau C, Buyse M, Ganem G, Landi B, Colin P, Louvet C, de Gramont A. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):229-37. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113. Epub 2003 Dec 2.

    PMID: 14657227BACKGROUND
  • Giantonio et. Al. High-dose bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX4 improves survival in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer: Results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study E3200

    BACKGROUND
  • Talamonti MS, Tellez C, Benson AB 3rd. Local-regional therapy for metastatic liver tumors. Cancer Treat Res. 1998;98:172-99. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10326669BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Radiofrequency AblationRadionuclide GeneratorsDrug Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesLiver DiseasesIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, OperativeRadiation Equipment and SuppliesEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • William Jacqmein

    Boston Scientific Corporation

    STUDY DIRECTOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2007

First Posted

August 2, 2007

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Study Completion

December 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 3, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations