Treatment of Hand Dysfunction After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many stroke survivors exhibit persistent upper limb motor deficits and a non-functional upper limb. There is some promising information that suggests motor learning (ML) in conjunction with functional electrical stimulation (FES; surface FES; nothing implanted; use of a commercially available system) of wrist/finger muscles can significantly enhance the functional level of the upper limb. There have been promising studies showing that some subjects in the chronic phase (greater than 6 months after stroke) responded favorably to combination FES and ML (FES ML). In our pilot studies, FES ML for those in the chronic phase (\>12 months) produced statistically significant functional recovery. FES was applied using a commercially available, two-channel FES system, with electrodes applied to the surface of the skin (non-invasive). But if upper limb dysfunction is not immediately treated, that is within the sub-acute phase (less than 6 months) following stroke, the following problems can develop: contractures and other soft tissue changes; chronic pain; and ingrained, abnormal, non-functional movement patterns. The more long-standing these symptoms are, the more resistant to treatment they become. Therefore, it is important to provide promising interventions prior to the onset of chronic symptoms and dysfunction. Those in the sub-acute phase after stroke should be provided with FES ML, in order to more completely restore function for a greater number of stroke survivors. Specific Aims and Hypotheses The goal of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of the proposed treatment in the sub acute phase following stroke. HYPOTHESIS. FES ML for 3hrs/day, five days/week, for 12 weeks will be feasible to implement in the sub-acute phase following stroke (2 -24 weeks). Study Design a. Specific Procedures This is a pilot study to test the feasibility of using FES ML for upper extremity rehabilitation in a sub-acute stroke population. It is a randomized, controlled, single-blind design. Subjects will be 2 - 24 weeks after a single stroke. The control group will receive standard care for upper limb rehabilitation consisting of passive and active exercise, stretching, bracing, and use of adaptive devices. The experimental group will receive the experimental intervention in addition to their standard care. CONTROL GROUP INTERVENTION. The control group will receive the standard medical care prescribed by the primary physician and covered by the subject's health care policy. Standard care will include: soft tissue mobilization; assisted motion exercise; active motion exercise; resistive exercise; task practice; use of assistive devices; and modality applications conventionally prescribed. FES ML INTERVENTION. The research treatment duration will be 3hrs/day, five days per week. The subjects will be present for a fourth hour each day, which will be used for breaks and rest periods that will be interspersed throughout the intervention time. The treatment duration is derived from prior work. We will stimulate muscles in a number of configurations including: wrist extension and finger extension; wrist extension and finger flexion; and wrist extension, finger flexion, and thumb abduction and opposition. Motor learning will include the performance of functional task components and full task practice during the use of FES. FES will be triggered by the patient, the treating therapist, or it will be automatically sequenced by the device according to alternate channel activations, with timings pre-set by the treating therapist. MEASURES. Data will be collected at weeks 1, 6, 12 (end of treatment), and 6 months after the end of treatment. Population The subjects will be sub-acute stroke survivors (2-24 weeks after stroke).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 7, 2014
CompletedFebruary 7, 2014
December 1, 2013
3 years
July 27, 2007
October 30, 2013
December 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Coordination Scale (FMUE)
A subscale of the Fugl-Meyer; the Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Coordination Scale is a measure of movement coordination in and out of synergy patterns for the hemiparetic upper limb; scores range from 0-66, with 0 being the worst score and 66 being the best score.
baseline and after 12 weeks of training
Study Arms (2)
FES and Motor Learning Training
EXPERIMENTALparticipants \<6 months after first stroke who presented with arm dysfunction were trained using FES and Motor Learning
Control group
OTHERSubjects in this arm will receive standard care as prescribed by their physician and covered by their insurance
Interventions
commercially available surface electrical stimulator
Standard care as ordered by their physician and covered by their insurance company.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- weeks after stroke
- Greater than 21 years old
- Ability to follow 2 step commands
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic, progressive medical condition (i.e. Parkinson's Disease)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Medical Center, Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This was a small pilot feasibility study providing data for future work.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Janis Daly, Ph.D., M.S.; Director, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center
- Organization
- Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville Florida
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janis Daly, PhD MS
VA Medical Center-Cleveland
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2007
First Posted
July 30, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 7, 2014
Results First Posted
February 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-12