The CSM Trial: A Multicenter Study Comparing Ventral to Dorsal Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
CSM
1 other identifier
interventional
103
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the optimal surgical approach (ventral versus dorsal) for patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). There are no established guidelines for the management of patients with CSM, which slowly causes spinal cord injury in afflicted patients. This study aims to test the hypothesis that ventral surgery (decompressing the spinal cord from the front of the neck) and dorsal surgery (decompressing the spinal cord from the back of the neck) might differ in their overall outcome or major complication rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Nov 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedAugust 29, 2012
August 1, 2012
5.5 years
July 24, 2007
August 28, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Neck Disability Index, mJOA, major complication rate
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), EuroQol-5D
1 year
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALVentral Decompression and Instrumented Fusion
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORDorsal Decompression with or without fusion
Interventions
Multi-level discectomy or Corpectomy are performed at surgeon's discretion. After decompression an instrumented fusion is performed.
Dorsal decompressive laminectomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy with lateral mass instrumented fusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (2 or more levels of spinal cord compression)
You may not qualify if:
- C2-C7 kyphosis\>5˚ (measured on lateral cervical spine image in extension)
- Segmental kyphotic deformity defined as 3 or more levels of disc-osteophyte extend dorsal to a line drawn from the dorsal caudal point of C2 to the dorsal caudal point of C7.
- Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)
- Developmental narrow canal (\<12 mm-canal diameter measured on lateral plain cervical spine film)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Greenwich Hospitallead
- Yale Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Danbury Hospital
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810, United States
Greenwich Hospital
Greenwich, Connecticut, 06830, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Lahey Clinic
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
University of Medicine and Dentistry - New Jersey
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
University of Utah HSC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132-2303, United States
Related Publications (3)
Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 1998 Aug;43(2):257-65; discussion 265-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00044.
PMID: 9696078BACKGROUNDEdwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1168-75. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00007.
PMID: 12045513BACKGROUNDGhogawala Z, Coumans JV, Benzel EC, Stabile LM, Barker FG 2nd. Ventral versus dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgeons' assessment of eligibility for randomization in a proposed randomized controlled trial: results of a survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):429-36. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255068.94058.8a.
PMID: 17304133RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zoher Ghogawala, MD, FACS
Greenwich Hospital - Yale Universtiy School of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward C. Benzel, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Heary, MD
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ronald Apfelbaum
University of Utah
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Valery Coumans, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Subu N Magge, MD
Lahey Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2007
First Posted
July 25, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 29, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08