Patients With Neck Pain Likely to Benefit From Thoracic Spine Thrust Mobilization
Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Neck Pain Likely to Benefit From Thoracic Spine Thrust Mobilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed that identifies patients with neck pain who are likely to respond rapidly and dramatically to thoracic spine thrust manipulation and an active range of motion exercise. Although the initial predictor variables identified during the development of a thoracic spine manipulation CPR seem to have adequate face validity, there is no guarantee that these factors will persist in a different group of patients, even ones with similar characteristics as those used in the initial exploratory study. The purpose of this follow-up study in which patients will be randomly assigned to receive thoracic spine thrust manipulation followed by therapeutic exercises or therapeutic exercise alone will be to investigate the validity of the previously developed CPR. If the CPR is indeed meaningful, patients who are positive on the CPR and receive thoracic spine thrust manipulation should experience improved outcomes compared to patients who are negative on the CPR and receive thoracic spine manipulation, and compared to patients who are positive on the CPR but receive the intervention believed to be effective for another subgroup of patients with neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jan 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFebruary 3, 2009
February 1, 2009
1.9 years
July 18, 2007
February 2, 2009
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neck Disability Index
4 weeks, 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain
4 week, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORmanual therapy - thoracic spine thrust manipulation
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORtherapeutic exercise
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary complaint of neck pain with or without unilateral upper extremity symptoms
- Age between 18-60 years old
- NDI score greater than 10 points
You may not qualify if:
- Red flags noted in the patient's Neck Medical Screening Questionnaire (i.e. tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, RA, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.)
- History of whiplash injury within the past six weeks
- Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis or bilateral upper extremity symptoms
- Evidence of central nervous system involvement, to include hyperreflexia, sensory disturbances in the hand, intrinsic muscle wasting of the hands, unsteadiness during walking, nystagmus, loss of visual acuity, impaired sensation of the face, altered taste, the presence of pathological reflexes (i.e. positive Hoffman's and/or Babinski reflexes), etc.
- Two or more positive neurologic signs consistent with nerve root compression, including any two of the following:
- Muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the upper extremity
- Diminished upper extremity muscle stretch reflex (biceps brachii, brachioradialis, or triceps reflex)
- Diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any upper extremity dermatome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Franklin Pierce Universitylead
- Newton-Wellesley Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Concord Hospital
Concord, New Hampshire, 03301, United States
Related Publications (1)
Cleland JA, Mintken PE, Carpenter K, Fritz JM, Glynn P, Whitman J, Childs JD. Examination of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and a general cervical range of motion exercise: multi-center randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;90(9):1239-50. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100123. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
PMID: 20634268DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua A Cleland, PT, PhD
Franklin Pierce University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2007
First Posted
July 20, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 3, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02