Assessing Drivers and Barriers to Follow-Up Screening for Anal Cancer in Men Who Have Sex With Men
2 other identifiers
observational
195
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to identify barriers that prevent men who have sex with men from receiving doctor-recommended annual follow-up screenings for anal cancer. Men who are at the highest risk for developing anal cancer will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire (either via telephone or in writing). The questionnaire is designed to identify potential barriers to care-seeking behavior including, relationship status, financial constraints, highest level of education and knowledge about anal cancer and its precursors. The men who agree to participate in the study will then be organized into groups based on their history of coming in for follow-up screening visits after learning that they are at higher risk for developing anal cancer. These groups include 1) men that have come in for regular screening visits (at least once per year), 2) men who came in once and were then lost to follow-up, 3) men who came in for more than one screening visit and were then lost to follow-up, and 4) men who were previously lost to follow-up and then began coming in for screening again. By comparing the men's responses across the different groups, we hope to uncover key barriers and drivers to follow-up screenings for anal cancer. The goal of this study is to evaluate the differences in questionnaire responses across cohorts that may impact care-seeking behavior. We hypothesize that:
- Patients who regularly comply with annual follow-up screening visits score higher on questions assessing knowledge of HPV and anal cancer.
- Men in stable relationships are more likely to comply with annual screening visit recommendations.
- Men who are educated by their primary care physicians about the importance of anal cancer screenings have higher screening rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2007
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedJune 23, 2011
June 1, 2011
11 months
July 12, 2007
June 21, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
Patients seen in the clinical practice that either had screening for dysplasia, stopped having screening or returned for screening after a period of absence.
You may qualify if:
- MSM patients in Dr. Stephen Goldstone's private surgical practice who previously tested positive for one of the known HPV subtypes (HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33 and 35) and developed condyloma and/or dysplasia in the anogenital region.
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to provide consent to participate in the telephone or written questionnaire.
- Development of anal cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laser Surgery Carelead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Laser Surgery Care
New York, New York, 10011, United States
Related Publications (1)
Truesdale MD, Goldstone SE. The fear factor: drivers and barriers to follow-up screening for human papillomavirus-related anal cancer in men who have sex with men. Int J STD AIDS. 2010 Jul;21(7):482-8. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2010.010070.
PMID: 20852198RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen E. Goldstone, M.D.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2007
First Posted
July 16, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-06