Oral Antibiotic Treatment at Home Instead of Intravenous Treatment in Hospital for Resistant Gram Positive Infections
A Prospective Implementation of an IV-oral Switch Policy to Treat Proven or Suspected Infections Due to Resistant Gram Positive Bacteria in a London Hospital Trust
2 other identifiers
interventional
211
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to find out whether changing the hospital policy to allow switch from glycopeptide antibiotics (given by intravenous drip), to an equally effective oral antibiotic (linezolid) will enable patients who are otherwise well enough to be discharged from hospital sooner. The secondary objectives are
- 1.To identify those patients who could potentially be discharged on an oral agent from those being treated with a glycopeptide, thus helping target this approach most effectively
- 2.To evaluate the cost involved and compare this with the costs that would have taken place if use of an oral agent and discharge had not occurred.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2007
CompletedOctober 26, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.7 years
July 12, 2007
October 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To identify the percentage of patients currently prescribed IV glycopeptides who could be discharged earlier if an oral agent was used
Period between IV oral switch and discharge, at least 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
To estimate the number of inpatient days that could be saved
Period between IV oral switch and discharge, at least 24 hours
To identify the groups of patients most likely to be suitable for earlier discharge if an oral agent was used
Period between IV oral switch and discharge, at least 24 hours
To identify the additional number of days of IV antibiotic treatment that could be prevented by using an oral agent in hospitalised patients
Period between IV oral switch and discharge, at least 24 hours
Study Arms (1)
Patients who fulfilled the study criteria
EXPERIMENTALIV to oral switch inclusion criteria used 1. Clinical status * Temperature less than 38°C for 24 hours * White cell count normalising * No unexplained tachycardia (Heart rate less than 100 beats per minute) * Sensitivity received (if microbiology positive) 2. Oral absorption * Patient tolerates oral fluids * No medical problems leading to reduced oral absorption (e.g. vomiting, diarrhoea, and gastrointestinal surgery) * No surgical operation scheduled within next 36 hours IV to oral switch exclusion criteria used 1. Continuing sepsis * Temperature less than 36°C or more than 38°C * White cell count less than 4 × 109/L or more than 12 × 109/L * Unexplained tachycardia (Heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute in last 12 hours) 2. Oral route compromised * Vomiting or severe diarrhoea * Other ongoing or potential absorption problem
Interventions
Linezolid is an antimicrobial with activity against MRSA that can be given orally.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prescribed five or more days glycopeptide
- Fulfil IV-oral switch criteria (see below) with likelihood of discharge within next 48 hours.
You may not qualify if:
- Renal dialysis out patients
- Suspected or proven left sided endocarditis/osteomyelitis/prosthetic infection where the prosthesis cannot be removed
- Per-protocol prescribing in haematology (i.e. where teicoplanin is prescribed in response to failure of fever resolution in neutropenic patients without microbiological or clinical evidence of gram positive infection).
- Age \< 16 years
- Pregnant or lactating female.
- Other contraindication to linezolid
- Clinically unlikely to be discharged within study period or at end of antibiotic therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imperial College Londonlead
- Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Imperial College London
London, w12 0nn, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Desai M, Franklin BD, Holmes AH, Trust S, Richards M, Jacklin A, Bamford KB. A new approach to treatment of resistant gram-positive infections: potential impact of targeted IV to oral switch on length of stay. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 8;6:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-94.
PMID: 16762061RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathleen B Bamford, MB BCh BAO
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2007
First Posted
July 13, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion
June 1, 2007
Study Completion
June 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10