Effectiveness of Telephone Versus Face-to-Face CBT in Treating People With Depression
Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Administration of CBT for Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
325
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effectiveness of telephone versus face-to-face administration of cognitive behavioral therapy in treating people with depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 depression
Started Dec 2007
Typical duration for phase_3 depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 17, 2013
CompletedJuly 17, 2013
July 1, 2013
4.4 years
July 8, 2007
August 20, 2012
July 15, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Attrition (Number of Therapy Sessions Attended)
Number of therapy sessions attended was collected. At the end of treatment, the total number of sessions attended by each patient was collected.
Post treatment, up to 18 weeks
Number of Participants Who Dropped Out of Therapy
Using the number of therapy sessions attended, we categorized patients into: 1. those who discontinued treatment before session 18, and those who completed session 18. 2. those who discontinued before Session 5, and those who continued.
Post treatment, up to 18 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Measures depression on a 9 - item scale. Scores range from 0-27, with 0 being no symptoms. A difference of 5 or more points on the PHQ-9 is considered a clinically meaningful response to treatment.
Measured at baseline; Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 18; and Months 3, 6 post-treatment follow-up
Depression, as Assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(Ham-D)
Ham-D indicates Hamilton Depression Rating Scale,range is 0 to 52. A score of 0 means the best outcome with no depression symptoms reported, and a score of 52 is the worse outcome with highest level of depression reported. A difference of 3 points on the Hamilton scale has been identified as clinically significant.
Measured at baseline; Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 18; and Months 3, 6, 9, and 12 of follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Health-related Quality of Life (SF-36V), Patient Satisfaction (Satisfaction Index - Mental Health), and Therapeutic Alliance (Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form)
Measured at baseline; Weeks 4, 9, 14, and 18; and Months 3, 6, 9, and 12 of follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Telephone-administered CBT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy.
Face-to-face CBT
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.
Interventions
Over 18 weeks, participants will receive eighteen 45-minute sessions of T-CBT administered by a therapist. Participants will undergo telephone-administered sessions twice a week for 2 weeks, once a week for 12 weeks, and once every 2 weeks for the last 4 weeks. Participants will be taught ways to modify thoughts and behaviors that contribute to their depression and ways to maintain the lifestyle changes that they have made.
Over 18 weeks, participants will receive eighteen 45-minute sessions of FtF-CBT administered by a therapist. Participants will undergo face-to-face administered sessions twice a week for 2 weeks, once a week for 12 weeks, and once every 2 weeks for the last 4 weeks. Participants will be taught ways to modify thoughts and behaviors that contribute to their depression and ways to maintain the lifestyle changes that they have made.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has a current diagnosis of major depressive disorder
- Has a primary care physician at Northwestern University in Illinois, or one of a number of approved community clinics in Chicago.
- Resides in Illinois
- Has a telephone
- Speaks and reads English
You may not qualify if:
- Hearing, voice, or visual impairment
- Meets criteria for dementia
- Diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, dissociative disorder, current substance abuse, or other condition for which participation in a clinical trial of psychotherapy may be either inappropriate or dangerous
- Currently receiving individual psychotherapy or planning to receive psychotherapy during the treatment phase of the study
- Planning to be out of town or unavailable for treatment for 4 weeks or more during the scheduled treatment time
- Recent history of suicide attempts or is severely suicidal
- Depression determined to be primarily of an organic etiology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (1)
Mohr DC, Ho J, Duffecy J, Reifler D, Sokol L, Burns MN, Jin L, Siddique J. Effect of telephone-administered vs face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy on adherence to therapy and depression outcomes among primary care patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jun 6;307(21):2278-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5588.
PMID: 22706833DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David C. Mohr
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David C. Mohr, PhD
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2007
First Posted
July 10, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 17, 2013
Results First Posted
July 17, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07