Healozone Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Ozone for Management of Dental Caries
A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Ozone for the Management of Fissure Caries
3 other identifiers
interventional
394
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Caries means demineralization with the formation of cavities and pulp symptoms and necrosis as an end result. The acids in the mouth are mainly produced by oral bacteria like Streptococcus mutans from bacterial biofilms adhering to the tooth. Ozone has been shown to have a very strong bactericidal effect on bacteria causing dental caries. Baysan et al reported that there was a statistically significant reduction of streptococci in root caries lesions and saliva samples after ozone application. The positive clinical effect of ozone with respect to arresting caries progression and the remineralization of caries has been shown in vitro and in vivo. In an in vivo study, Baysan and Lynch found that the application of ozone resulted in a significant reduction of bacterial contamination as well as a reduction in size and severity of root caries lesions. In a subsequent study, Baysan and Lynch reported that the severity of root caries lesions was significantly reduced after ozone application as measured by electrical conductance and laser fluorescence. In several studies, the caries reducing effect of ozone was measured with biochemical methods in root surface caries lesions, the biofilm and saliva after ozone application. See Citation section for references. The objectives of this multi-center clinical study were to determine: (1) the effectiveness of the HealOzone in stopping the progression of fissure caries; and (2) the oral soft tissue safety of the ozone system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2007
Typical duration for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 23, 2010
CompletedFebruary 20, 2015
February 1, 2015
2.2 years
July 1, 2007
October 12, 2010
February 2, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ICDAS Severity Value
Clinically significant changes indicating caries progression are defined as changes in ICDAS severity values from 1 or 2 to a 3 or higher, or from a 3 or 4 to a 5 or higher. The severity criteria are as follows: 0 = Sound tooth surface. 1. = First visual change in enamel. 2. = Distinct visual change in enamel. 3. = Localized enamel breakdown due to caries with no visible dentin. 4. = Underlying dark shadow from dentin, with or without localized enamel breakdown. 5. = Distinct cavity with visible dentin. 6. = Extensive distinct cavity with visible dentin.
Baseline and One Year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Caries Lesion Activity
Baseline and one year
Progression of Radiographic Scores at 12 Months
one year
Laser Fluorescence Progression-12 Month (Increase From <=20 to >=30)
one year
Laser Fluorescence Progression-12 Month (Increase at Least 10)
one year
Study Arms (2)
Ozone treatment
EXPERIMENTALOzone treatment of randomly selected study tooth for 60 seconds
Placebo, no ozone
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo treatment (no ozone) of randomly selected study tooth for 60 seconds.
Interventions
Ozone treatment applied to randomly selected tooth for a period of 60 seconds at Baseline, Three, Six and Nine-Month visits.
Placebo treatment applied to randomly selected tooth for a period of 60 seconds at Baseline, Three-, Six- and Nine-Month visits.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be eligible for study participation, subjects had to:
- \. provide written informed consent, HIPAA authorization and medical history information prior to their participation; 2. be between the ages of 10 and 40 years of age; 3. if female and of childbearing potential, agree to:
- a urine pregnancy test, which must be negative;
- use one form of medically accepted contraceptive measures which include oral contraceptives, condom, or diaphragm with spermicide, Intra Uterine Device (IUD), Depo-Provera, Norplant during the study and for at least 30 days after the last treatment. (Females who are post menopausal, i.e. amenorrhea for the previous 12 months, or surgically sterile may be included.) 4. be in good general health as evidenced by a review of the medical history; 5. have good oral health; 6. agree to comply with all subjects' responsibilities as stated in the protocol (e.g. attendance at appointments, turning off of cell phone during appointment, etc.); and 7. have two posterior (molar or premolar) teeth with active fissure caries as defined by ICDAS severity score between 1 and 4, a caries lesion activity score of 2, and with radiographic evidence indicating that there is no extension past the dentinal enamel junction. Lesions within the same subject ideally should have the same ICDAS criterion; however, the following deviations will be acceptable - teeth with ICDAS criterion 1 paired with a 2, and a 3 paired with a 4.
You may not qualify if:
- Any of the following excluded subjects from participating:
- a medical condition that requires antibiotic therapy prior to dental work;
- any medical condition that could be expected to interfere with the subject's safety, such as a pacemaker or similar powered implant;
- selected study teeth with occlusal restorations, sealants, carious lesions extending into dentin, hypomineralization or fluorosis;
- generalized severe gingivitis or gross unrestored caries;
- orthodontic appliances that interfere with access to selected study teeth;
- pregnant or nursing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Indiana Universitylead
- Tufts University School of Dental Medicinecollaborator
- State University of New York at Buffalocollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Indiana University School of Dentistry
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study length may have been too brief to permit progression of early stage caries; Low caries increment in study population; Difficult to establish that lesions were truly active at baseline.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Domenick T. Zero, DDS MS Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Indiana University School of Dentistry
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Domenick T Zero, DDS MS
Indiana University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Athena Papas, DMD, PhD
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sebastian Ciancio, DDS, PhD
SUNY School of Dental Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2007
First Posted
July 3, 2007
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 20, 2015
Results First Posted
December 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2015-02