Different Approaches for Delivery of IPT in Pregnancy in Burkina Faso
A Comparison of Different Approaches for Delivery of Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT)to Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso With Regard to Coverage and Compliance
2 other identifiers
interventional
11,523
1 country
1
Brief Summary
IPT/SP was adopted in 2005 by The Ministry of Health (MoH) of Burkina Faso to replace chemoprophylaxis with CQ in pregnancy. The new strategy is being implemented but no delivery approach was defined and presumably IPT/SP will only be delivered to pregnant women presenting at ANC visits. It would be of extreme importance to ensure a better coverage and higher compliance to make the new strategy effective. In order to obtain a more efficient IPT/SP programme with a good level of compliance and coverage, several delivery approaches beside ANC should be explored. The study site will be in Pissy health district covering both peri-urban Ouagadougou city and rural areas. Participants include pregnant women irrespective of gravidity residing in the study area. The study is a prospective comparative study of 3 different approaches of delivering IPT/SP in the catchment areas of rural health facilities. The approaches will be the following:
- 1.Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visits.
- 2.Joint, with an advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits.
- 3.Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to achieve the required sample size. The zones will be randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT, b) compliance, c) infection prevalence, d) Hb level, e) difficulties and constraints of each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. to be able to identify a significant increase in coverage of 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedJanuary 26, 2017
January 1, 2017
2.4 years
June 28, 2007
January 25, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
compliance
24 month after study start
coverage
24 month after study start
Study Arms (3)
ANC approach
NO INTERVENTIONPassive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visit.
advanced strategies SP
OTHERJoint with advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery of IPT/sulphadoxine pyrimethamine (SP) at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits.
Community based
OTHERCommunity based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to achieve the required sample size. The zones will be randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT, b) compliance, c) infection prevalence, d) Hb level, e) difficulties and constraints of each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. Coverage by 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women.
Interventions
Health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visit. Joint with advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women of all parities
- Second trimester
You may not qualify if:
- Severely ill pregnant women
- Pregnant women in first trimester
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pissy Health District
Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, 09, Burkina Faso
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheick O Coulibaly, MD, PhD
Laboratoire National de Sante Publique
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2007
First Posted
June 29, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01