NCT00488280

Brief Summary

The Kids STEP Study aims to

  1. 1.Determine if walking can be restored in children with incomplete SCI and little to no leg movement
  2. 2.Identify the neural pathways that permit recovery of walking

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2007

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2007

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 20, 2007

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2007

Last Update Submit

November 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

walkingwalking recoveryphysical therapylocomotor trainingbody weight supportneuroplasticitysteptreadmilltreadmill traininglocomotion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recovery of walking, assessed in treadmill/ BWS environment and overground

    pre-training, after 20, 40, and 60 sessions of locomotor training

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Amount of daily step activity

    during and post 60 sessions of locomotor training

  • Walking independence, WISCI II

    during and post 60 sessions of locomotor training

  • Stepping assessment and kinematic analysis

    Post 20, 40, and 60 sessions of locomotor training

  • Analysis of locomotor tasks such as crawling, swimming, cycling

    post 20, 40, and 60 sessions of locomotor training

  • Self-selected and fast gait speed

    Pre-training and after 20, 40, 60 sessions (post-LT)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Kids Step Study: Locomotor Training

All children who participate will be in the experimental cohort, KSS-#, and receive 60 sessions of daily locomotor training. This experimental cohort will also undergo clinical and neurophysiological testing pre, during, and post 60 sessions of locomotor training.

Behavioral: Locomotor Training

Interventions

Task-specific practice of walking with assistance from trainers using body weight support and treadmill followed by training over ground, 5x/week, approximately 1.5 hours/day

Also known as: body weight supported treadmill training, activity-based therapy
Kids Step Study: Locomotor Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 13 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Children with SCI for whom walking recovery is unlikely

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals with SCI will include:
  • Pre-adolescent children, ages 3-13 yrs old
  • A diagnosis of first time, non-progressive SCI, upper motor neuron lesion, including, but not limited to, etiology from trauma, inflammation, vascular, surgical re-section due to localized tumor removal or orthopedic pathology resulting in clinical signs of lower cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury
  • Non-ambulatory or impaired ambulation for greater than 1 yr, such that physical assistance and the use of assistive devices (i.e. walker) and/or leg braces (i.e. knee- ankle- foot orthoses (KAFOs)) are required to ambulate
  • A SCI as defined by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale category B or C
  • A medically stable condition that is asymptomatic for bladder infection, decubiti, osteoporosis, cardiopulmonary disease, pain, or other significant medical complications that would prohibit or interfere with testing of walking function and training or alter compliance with a training protocol
  • Documented medical approval from the participant's personal physician verifying the participant's medical status
  • Parent's informed consent for children

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with SCI who -
  • Are currently participating in a rehabilitation program or another research protocol that could interfere or influence the outcome measures of the current study
  • Have a history of congenital SCI (e.g. Chiari malformation, myelomeningocele, intraspinal neoplasm, Frederich's ataxia) or other degenerative spinal disorders (e.g. spinocerebellar degeneration or syringomyelia) that may complicate the treatment and/or evaluation procedures
  • Children who are diabetic or have implants, pacemakers, or devices which are not NMR/MRI compatible and are not suitable for the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(3-4):571-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.571.

    PMID: 16629638BACKGROUND
  • Barbeau H, Ladouceur M, Norman KE, Pepin A, Leroux A. Walking after spinal cord injury: evaluation, treatment, and functional recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Feb;80(2):225-35. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90126-0.

    PMID: 10025502BACKGROUND
  • Behrman AL, Lawless-Dixon AR, Davis SB, Bowden MG, Nair P, Phadke C, Hannold EM, Plummer P, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1356-71.

    PMID: 16305274BACKGROUND
  • Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000 Jul;80(7):688-700.

    PMID: 10869131BACKGROUND
  • Edgerton VR, Tillakaratne NJ, Bigbee AJ, de Leon RD, Roy RR. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:145-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144308.

    PMID: 15217329BACKGROUND
  • Behrman AL, Bowden MG, Nair PM. Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery. Phys Ther. 2006 Oct;86(10):1406-25. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050212.

    PMID: 17012645BACKGROUND
  • Howland DR, Trimble SA, Fox EJ, Tester NJ, Spiess MR, Senesac CR, Kleim JA, Spierre LZ, Rose DK, Johns JS, Ugiliweneza B, Reier PJ, Behrman AL. Recovery of walking in nonambulatory children with chronic spinal cord injuries: Case series. J Neurosci Res. 2023 Jun;101(6):826-842. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25162. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Andrea L Behrman, PhD, PT

    University of Florida

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dena R Howland, PhD, OT

    University of Florida

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2007

First Posted

June 20, 2007

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations