Laparoscopic Assisted Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Assisted and Open Resection for Colonic and Rectal Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the investigators' randomized trial is to compare the short-term clinical outcome and survival between laparoscopic-assisted and open resection of colorectal carcinoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 1993
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 1993
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedMarch 31, 2009
March 1, 2009
15.1 years
June 11, 2007
March 30, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival and disease-free survival
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Operative time
Blood loss
Postoperative analgesic requirements
Recovery of gastrointestinal function (time to resume normal diet, time first passing flatus, time of first bowel motion)
Time to walk independently
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed to have colorectal carcinoma at all locations except transverse colon
- Informed consent available
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with tumor \>6 cm in size, or with tumor infiltration to adjacent organs on imagings
- Patients with previous abdominal surgery near the region of the colorectal surgery
- Patients with intestinal obstruction or perforation
- Patients with recurrent disease
- Patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong SAR, China
Related Publications (2)
Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS, Mak TW, Ngo DK, Leung WW, Leung KL. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3187-x. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
PMID: 24013470DERIVEDLi JC, Leung KL, Ng SS, Liu SY, Lee JF, Hon SS. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection of right-sided colonic cancer--a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;27(1):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1294-5. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
PMID: 21861071DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ka Lau Leung, MD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2007
First Posted
June 12, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 1993
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 31, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-03