NCT00484718

Brief Summary

The Purpose of this trial is to evaluate the use of a cross-over trial design in an osteoarthritis population. We will determine the inter- and intra-subject variability in osteoarthritis (OA) endpoints and evaluate if efficacy can be detected by measuring OA endpoints following treatment with 2 different types of analgesics in a crossover study of this design.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2007

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2007

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2008

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 10, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 10, 2009

Completed
11.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 8, 2007

Results QC Date

March 17, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 12

    The severity of arthritis pain in participant's signal knee at the time of the visit was assessed using an 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate worse pain.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 12

    The severity of arthritis pain in participant's signal knee was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS ranging from 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain. Higher score indicate more pain.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Week 12

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). The index consists of 24 questions (5 pain, 2 stiffness, and 17 physical function). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse pain. Pain subscale total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating worse pain.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 12

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in in the study joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse physical function. Physical function subscale scores range from 0 to 68, where higher scores indicated more difficulty in performing daily activities.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 12

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in study joint. The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the in the study joint during the past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranges from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signifies worse stiffness. The stiffness subscale score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicated worse stiffness.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index Total Score at Week 12

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA of the hip and/or knee). The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 \[minimum\] to 4 \[maximum\], higher score indicating worse study joint condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Knee Adduction Moment at Week 12

    Adduction (external) moment was defined as the ground-generated torque that forces the distal tibia toward the midline of the body, which forces the knee away from the midline, into a varus or "bow-legged" position. External knee adduction moment was assessed as percent body weight\*height (%BW\*ht).

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Inhibition at Week 12

    Quadriceps inhibition was assessed in terms of flexion-extension range of motion and normalized mid stance knee flexion angle in degrees.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Peak Ground Reaction Force at Week 12

    Change from baseline in peak ground reaction force in body weight\*seconds (BW\*sec) was assessed with the help of a multicomponent force plate.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Total Ground Reaction Force at Week 12

    Change from baseline in total ground reaction force in body weight\*seconds was assessed with the help of a multicomponent force plate.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Stride Length at Week 12

    The level walking was assessed by stride length; assessment was done based on 6 stride cycles over a range of walking speeds.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Walking Speed at Week 12

    Change from baseline in walking speed in meters per second was assessed.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Cadence at Week 12

    Cadence was defined as the rate at which a person walk, expressed in steps per minute.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition (PGAAC) Score at Week 12

    The PGAAC is self-administered measure in which participants answered the following question: "considering all the ways the OA in your signal knee affects you, how are you doing today?". Participants rated their condition using the following scale: 1= very good (no symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); 5= very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

    Baseline, Week 12

Study Arms (3)

A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: celecoxib

B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Oxycodone

C

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: placebo

Interventions

oral, 100 mg bid

A

oral, 20 mg bid

B

oral bid

C

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject has been taking an NSAID at least 15 of the past 30 days for index knee pain
  • Grades 2 or 3 OA as defined by the Kellgren and Lawrence Grading System of the medial tibiofemoral joint (joint space narrowing in the medial compartment \> lateral compartment as assessed by x-ray) using the Altman Atlas of OA7. This must be documented with a report from an x-ray of the study joint taken either at screening or within 1 year prior to screening
  • Subject meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical classification criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee, defined by the following: Knee pain and at least 3 of the following: oAge \>50 oMorning stiffness \<30 minutes oCrepitus on active motion oBony tenderness oBony enlargement oNo palpable warmth of synovium.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a clinically significant intolerance to celecoxib, sulfonamides, aspirin, or opioids including oxycodone
  • Significant pain outside the index knee, including significant hip or back pain that can not be distinguished from OA pain or that interferes with ability to walk. (Patients with bilateral knee OA will be allowed into the study. The index knee should be defined as the more painful knee
  • Predominantly patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis in the index knee as assessed by clinical examination
  • Subject who are unable to discontinue all formulations of prior analgesics other than acetaminophen during the Washout Period of the study, or who are anticipated to be unable to discontinue rescue medication for 24 hours prior to the respective visits. (Low dose aspirin may be taken for cardiac prophylaxis
  • Excessive signal knee joint laxity indicative of functional ligamentous deficiency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

VAPAHCS

Palo Alto, California, 94304-1290, United States

Location

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Asay JL, Boyer KA, Andriacchi TP. Repeatability of gait analysis for measuring knee osteoarthritis pain in patients with severe chronic pain. J Orthop Res. 2013 Jul;31(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/jor.22228. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

  • Boyer KA, Angst MS, Asay J, Giori NJ, Andriacchi TP. Sensitivity of gait parameters to the effects of anti-inflammatory and opioid treatments in knee osteoarthritis patients. J Orthop Res. 2012 Jul;30(7):1118-24. doi: 10.1002/jor.22037. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Interventions

CelecoxibOxycodone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BenzenesulfonamidesSulfonamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsSulfonesSulfur CompoundsPyrazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsCodeineMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

No efficacy analysis were conducted, as this study was stopped due to a high screen failure rate before the planned enrollment required to carry out the pre-specified efficacy analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2007

First Posted

June 11, 2007

Study Start

January 17, 2008

Primary Completion

June 10, 2009

Study Completion

June 10, 2009

Last Updated

April 14, 2021

Results First Posted

April 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Locations