NCT00468676

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led case management intervention in improving disease control and depression symptoms in adults with diabetes and/or heart disease who are also depressed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
214

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2007

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 2, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2014

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

May 1, 2007

Results QC Date

December 13, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

major Depressive DisorderDiabetesHeart Disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Combined Effect of Intervention on SCL-20, Systolic Blood Pressure, LDL and HbA1c

    A scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL: all data submitted as Outcome Measures #2-5 below) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.The model was estimated by iterating between estimation of the covariance associated with the outcomes and generalized-estimating equation estimation of scaled outcomes. Effect size is estimated as Cohen d effect size that was use for the depression outcome is the difference in change from baseline to 12 months in the intervention and usual care groups divided by the pooled base line standard deviation. Thus, a d of 0.25 indicates that one-quarter of a standard deviation separates the two means. Cohen has suggested that an effect size of 0.20 would be considered small, 0.50 medium and 0.80 large.

    Baseline to 12 months

  • Symptom Checklist-20 Score at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months

    SCL-20 is a 20 question checklist in which items are averaged to yield a potential score of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.

    Measured at Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months

  • Systolic Blood Pressure at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months

    Systolic Blood Pressure was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.

    Measured at Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months

  • LDL Cholesterol at Baseline and 12 Months

    LDL Cholesterol was measured at Baseline and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.

    Measured at Baseline and 12 months

  • Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months

    Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.

    Measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Functional Impairment

    Measured at Months 6, 12 months

  • Health Care Costs

    Cumulative outpatient costs over 24 months

Study Arms (2)

B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual

Behavioral: Treatment as usual

A

EXPERIMENTAL

Case management intervention

Behavioral: Nurse-led case management

Interventions

The case management intervention will entail approximately 10 visits with a trained nurse at the clinic or by telephone. Participants in this group will receive educational materials about how to manage diabetes and/or heart disease and stress or depression. Nurses will also provide guidance and support in managing medications, phone calls to check participants' progress, and assistance in setting personal goals and in managing physical health problems and symptoms of depression or stress.

A

Participants will attend 10 study visits and receive 4 follow-up phone calls over 24 months. During this time, participants will receive usual care.

B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes and/or heart disease
  • Poor disease control (defined as an HbA1c level of at least 8.5%, blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol greater than 130 mg/dL)
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder

You may not qualify if:

  • History of psychosis
  • At high risk for suicide
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Current alcohol or substance abuse disorder
  • Does not own a telephone
  • Currently seeking psychiatric care
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Currently enrolled in a Group Health Cooperative disease management program
  • Terminal illness
  • Plans to leave Group Health Cooperative in less than a year
  • Does not speak English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Group Health Cooperative

Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, Young B, Peterson D, Rutter CM, McGregor M, McCulloch D. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003955.

  • Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Peterson D, Ludman EJ, Rutter CM, Oliver M, Young BA, Gensichen J, McGregor M, McCulloch DK, Wagner EH, Katon WJ. Treatment adjustment and medication adherence for complex patients with diabetes, heart disease, and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):6-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1343.

  • Von Korff M, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Ciechanowski P, Peterson D, Ludman EJ, Young B, Rutter CM. Functional outcomes of multi-condition collaborative care and successful ageing: results of randomised trial. BMJ. 2011 Nov 10;343:d6612. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6612.

  • Katon W, Russo J, Lin EH, Schmittdiel J, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E, Peterson D, Young B, Von Korff M. Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 May;69(5):506-14. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1548.

  • Ludman EJ, Peterson D, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Young B, Gensichen J. Improving confidence for self care in patients with depression and chronic illnesses. Behav Med. 2013;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2012.708682.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionDepressive Disorder, MajorDiabetes MellitusHeart Diseases

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorDepressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Limitations include the study being completed in one health care system in one geographic area, inadequate power to determine cardiovascular events or rates of hospitalization, potential "spill-over of intervention to usual care patients.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Wayne Katon, Professor and Vice Chair
Organization
Dept Psychiatry, University of Washington Medical School

Study Officials

  • Wayne J. Katon, MD

    University of Washington

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Vice Chair University of Washington

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2007

First Posted

May 3, 2007

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion

October 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 2, 2014

Results First Posted

May 2, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations