Nurse-led Case Management for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Patients With Depression
Randomized Trial of Liaison Psychiatry in Primary Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
214
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led case management intervention in improving disease control and depression symptoms in adults with diabetes and/or heart disease who are also depressed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression
Started May 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 2, 2014
CompletedMay 2, 2014
May 1, 2014
3.4 years
May 1, 2007
December 13, 2013
May 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Combined Effect of Intervention on SCL-20, Systolic Blood Pressure, LDL and HbA1c
A scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL: all data submitted as Outcome Measures #2-5 below) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.The model was estimated by iterating between estimation of the covariance associated with the outcomes and generalized-estimating equation estimation of scaled outcomes. Effect size is estimated as Cohen d effect size that was use for the depression outcome is the difference in change from baseline to 12 months in the intervention and usual care groups divided by the pooled base line standard deviation. Thus, a d of 0.25 indicates that one-quarter of a standard deviation separates the two means. Cohen has suggested that an effect size of 0.20 would be considered small, 0.50 medium and 0.80 large.
Baseline to 12 months
Symptom Checklist-20 Score at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
SCL-20 is a 20 question checklist in which items are averaged to yield a potential score of 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Measured at Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months
Systolic Blood Pressure at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Systolic Blood Pressure was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Measured at Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months
LDL Cholesterol at Baseline and 12 Months
LDL Cholesterol was measured at Baseline and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Measured at Baseline and 12 months
Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Baseline, 6 Months and 12 Months
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months For the Primary Outcome (Outcome Measure #1 above), a scaled marginal model approach was used to jointly describe the four 12 month outcomes (SCL-20, HbA1c, systolic BP, LDL) and allowed use to test for a primary effect of the intervention among outcomes, scaling each outcome by its standard error, so the intervention effects could be interpreted as effect sizes.
Measured at Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Functional Impairment
Measured at Months 6, 12 months
Health Care Costs
Cumulative outpatient costs over 24 months
Study Arms (2)
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment as usual
A
EXPERIMENTALCase management intervention
Interventions
The case management intervention will entail approximately 10 visits with a trained nurse at the clinic or by telephone. Participants in this group will receive educational materials about how to manage diabetes and/or heart disease and stress or depression. Nurses will also provide guidance and support in managing medications, phone calls to check participants' progress, and assistance in setting personal goals and in managing physical health problems and symptoms of depression or stress.
Participants will attend 10 study visits and receive 4 follow-up phone calls over 24 months. During this time, participants will receive usual care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of diabetes and/or heart disease
- Poor disease control (defined as an HbA1c level of at least 8.5%, blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol greater than 130 mg/dL)
- Diagnosis of major depressive disorder
You may not qualify if:
- History of psychosis
- At high risk for suicide
- Cognitive impairment
- Current alcohol or substance abuse disorder
- Does not own a telephone
- Currently seeking psychiatric care
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Currently enrolled in a Group Health Cooperative disease management program
- Terminal illness
- Plans to leave Group Health Cooperative in less than a year
- Does not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Group Health Cooperative
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
Related Publications (5)
Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, Young B, Peterson D, Rutter CM, McGregor M, McCulloch D. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003955.
PMID: 21190455RESULTLin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Peterson D, Ludman EJ, Rutter CM, Oliver M, Young BA, Gensichen J, McGregor M, McCulloch DK, Wagner EH, Katon WJ. Treatment adjustment and medication adherence for complex patients with diabetes, heart disease, and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):6-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1343.
PMID: 22230825RESULTVon Korff M, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Ciechanowski P, Peterson D, Ludman EJ, Young B, Rutter CM. Functional outcomes of multi-condition collaborative care and successful ageing: results of randomised trial. BMJ. 2011 Nov 10;343:d6612. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6612.
PMID: 22074851RESULTKaton W, Russo J, Lin EH, Schmittdiel J, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E, Peterson D, Young B, Von Korff M. Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 May;69(5):506-14. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1548.
PMID: 22566583RESULTLudman EJ, Peterson D, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Young B, Gensichen J. Improving confidence for self care in patients with depression and chronic illnesses. Behav Med. 2013;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2012.708682.
PMID: 23398269DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations include the study being completed in one health care system in one geographic area, inadequate power to determine cardiovascular events or rates of hospitalization, potential "spill-over of intervention to usual care patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Wayne Katon, Professor and Vice Chair
- Organization
- Dept Psychiatry, University of Washington Medical School
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wayne J. Katon, MD
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Vice Chair University of Washington
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2007
First Posted
May 3, 2007
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 2, 2014
Results First Posted
May 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05