The Effect of Amputation on Spatial Visual Representation in Peripersonal Space
The Effect of Upper Arm Amputation and the Use of Prosthetics on Spatial Visual Representation in Peripersonal Space - a Behavioural Study
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, we wish to find behavioral evidence for the question whether an amputation of the arm can lead to changes in visual perception or motor responses to objects in peripersonal space. We hypothesize that changes in the motor and somatosensory hand-related cortices following amputation might lead to changes in parietal hand-related areas. The consequence of these parietal changes should be reflected behaviorally in reduced perception/attention/responses to hand-related objects in the space ipsilateral to the amputation. We further hypothesize that the use of prosthetics may provide the necessary visual feedback to maintain an intact hand representation and therefore lead to lesser cortical reorganization in both visual and somatosensory cortical areas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2007
CompletedNovember 30, 2017
March 1, 2007
April 10, 2007
November 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
In this experiment we plan to employ a paradigm which is inspired by the affordance effect, originally introduced by Tucker and Elice (1998): we will present subjects with brief images of either manipulable or non manipulable objects in either the left or right visual field. The subjects will be required to determine whether the object contains a metal or not, by moving either their left or their right shoulder. We predict that while the control group of normal subjects would show a congruency effect (that is superior performance (faster and more accurate responses) when the responding shoulder is congruent with the position of the objects, the amputees will show spatial biases towards the non-amputated side. This effect should be more prominent for the manipulable objects.
You may qualify if:
- Upper limb amputee, amputation above wrist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neurobiology Dep., Life Sciences Institute, Hebrew Uni.
Jerusalem, 91904, Israel
Related Publications (2)
Makin TR, Holmes NP, Zohary E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 24;27(4):731-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007.
PMID: 17251412BACKGROUNDTucker M, Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):830-46. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.830.
PMID: 9627419BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Isabella Schuartz, MD
Rehabilitation Dep. Hadassah Medical Hospital, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2007
First Posted
April 11, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2007
Last Updated
November 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2007-03