NCT00458757

Brief Summary

In this study, we wish to find behavioral evidence for the question whether an amputation of the arm can lead to changes in visual perception or motor responses to objects in peripersonal space. We hypothesize that changes in the motor and somatosensory hand-related cortices following amputation might lead to changes in parietal hand-related areas. The consequence of these parietal changes should be reflected behaviorally in reduced perception/attention/responses to hand-related objects in the space ipsilateral to the amputation. We further hypothesize that the use of prosthetics may provide the necessary visual feedback to maintain an intact hand representation and therefore lead to lesser cortical reorganization in both visual and somatosensory cortical areas.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2007

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2007

First QC Date

April 10, 2007

Last Update Submit

November 29, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

AmputeesAffordancePeripersonal spacePseudo neglectReachingSpatialvisual

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

In this experiment we plan to employ a paradigm which is inspired by the affordance effect, originally introduced by Tucker and Elice (1998): we will present subjects with brief images of either manipulable or non manipulable objects in either the left or right visual field. The subjects will be required to determine whether the object contains a metal or not, by moving either their left or their right shoulder. We predict that while the control group of normal subjects would show a congruency effect (that is superior performance (faster and more accurate responses) when the responding shoulder is congruent with the position of the objects, the amputees will show spatial biases towards the non-amputated side. This effect should be more prominent for the manipulable objects.

You may qualify if:

  • Upper limb amputee, amputation above wrist.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Neurobiology Dep., Life Sciences Institute, Hebrew Uni.

Jerusalem, 91904, Israel

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Makin TR, Holmes NP, Zohary E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 24;27(4):731-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007.

    PMID: 17251412BACKGROUND
  • Tucker M, Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):830-46. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.830.

    PMID: 9627419BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Personal Space

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spatial BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Isabella Schuartz, MD

    Rehabilitation Dep. Hadassah Medical Hospital, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Isabella Schuartz, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2007

First Posted

April 11, 2007

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Last Updated

November 30, 2017

Record last verified: 2007-03

Locations