Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml
1 other identifier
interventional
192
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The rate of labor induction is rising throughout the United States for a variety of reasons. Medical conditions that lead to increased risk of prolonging the pregnancy to both mother and fetus are not infrequent. In addition, elective deliveries are becoming more common. Foley balloon catheter placement is a common method used for labor induction in women with an unfavorable cervical assessment. There are several studies using various volumes of Foley balloon catheters for labor induction ranging from 30ml to 80ml, however, there are no studies replicating the findings of the largest study comparing 2 different volumes in the balloon. The investigators plan to compare instillation of 30ml of sterile saline versus 60ml in a Foley balloon catheter for women undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. The investigators will observe the following outcomes: rate of delivery within 24 hours, cervical dilation after foley balloon catheter expulsion, insertion to balloon expulsion interval, induction to delivery time interval, peak oxytocin requirement, presence of infection or meconium, cesarean delivery rate, operative vaginal delivery rate, indication for operative vaginal or cesarean delivery, cervical laceration rate, placental abruption rate, 5-minute Apgar score, and umbilical cord arterial blood pH and base excess.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2006
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedAugust 2, 2013
July 1, 2013
2.7 years
March 22, 2007
July 31, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours
within 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Cervical dilation after Foley balloon catheter expulsion
within 24hours
Time to catheter expulsion
hours
Duration of the first stage of labor
hours
Time interval from induction to active labor
hours
Induction to delivery interval
hours
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALFoley balloon wih 60cc fluid
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORFoley balloon with 30cc
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Reproductive aged women, pregnant, term gestation (\>37 weeks), undergoing induction of labor, cervical exam acceptable as a candidate for Foley balloon catheter placement (Bishop score \<5), cephalic fetal presentation.
You may not qualify if:
- Regular contractions on admission, rupture of membranes, previous uterine scar, low-lying placenta (measured \<3cm to internal os), Bishop score \> 5, contraindication to attempt at vaginal birth, non-English/Spanish speaking, unable to give consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (2)
de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
PMID: 36996264DERIVEDDelaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas J, Sparks TN, Paul K, Caughey AB. Labor induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30 mL compared with 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1239-1245. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0.
PMID: 20502296DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aaron B Caughey, MD,PhD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2007
First Posted
March 23, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 2, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07