DL6049 Versus Cosmoplast in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles, Long Term Follow-up
A Randomized Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of DL6049 (Injectable Poly-l-lactic Acid) Versus Cosmoplast Collagen Implant in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles (Long Term Follow-up)
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is being undertaken to:
- evaluate the degree of correction attainable with DL6049 (injectable poly-L-lactic acid)compared to a commercially available CosmoPlast™ Collagen Implant in the treatment of dermal nasolabial fold wrinkles at 13 months following the last application of study treatment.
- Document the types and incidence of adverse events reported with DL6049 (injectable poly-L-lactic acid)compared with CosmoPlast™ Collagen Implant. Long term adverse events will be assessed for an additional 12 months following discharge from the main study in subjects treated with DL6049.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2004
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2007
CompletedSeptember 18, 2019
September 1, 2019
March 5, 2007
September 14, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate degree of correction attainable with DL6049 compared to CosmoPlast Collagen Implant
in the treatment of dermal nasolabial fold wrinkles at 13 months following last application of study treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment group comparisons at each timepoint of the treatment success rate (proportion of subjects with a photographic wrinkle severity grade of < 2), mean wrinkle severity grade, and investigator/subject global assessments.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must sign a statement of IC and HIPAA authorization. In addition subjects must provide a separate release for use of their photographs in publications; any subject has a right to refuse the photo release without jeopardizing their ability to participate in the study.
- Subjects must be 18-75 yrs of age, of any race or sex
- Female subjects must be post-menopausal for at least 1 yr or have had a hysterectomy; or have a had a tubal ligation; or if of child-bearing potential, must agree to use an approved method of birth control throughout the study (i.e, oral/systemic contraceptives, IUD, or spermicide in combination with barrier method of contraception).
- Subjects seeking augmentation therapy for bilateral correction of nasolabial folds. Subjects must have a score of greater than or equal to 2 and less than or equal to 4 on the photo-numeric wrinkle assessment scale (assessed by a blinded evaluator) of both the left and right nasolabial fold at Visit 1.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with a personal history of allergic/anaphylactic reactions including hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (e.g.,lidocaine, etc.), bovine collagen, latex, silicone, carmellose, or mannitol.
- Subjects with a known history of keloids or bleeding disorders.
- Subjects with an active inflammatory process in the area to be treated (skin eruptions such as cysts, pimples, rashes, cancerous/pre-cancerous lesions, or any other active skin disease).
- Subjects with active hepatitis within the past year.
- Subjects who are pregnant (confirmation by pregnancy testing),or plan to become pregnant within the study timeframe, or who are nursing.
- Subjects who plan to undergo major facial surgery (e.g., rhinoplasty with or without implant, facelift, congenital defect repair, etc. during the course of the study.
- Subjects with clinically important disease as judged by the investigator within 3 months of the study (e.g., significant lab abnormalities, myocardial infarct, stroke, cancer, connective tissue diseases, etc.) including subjects with medical conditions that might require the use of immunosuppressive medications during the trial (e.g., severe asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.).
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sanofi-Aventis
Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807, United States
Related Publications (2)
Brown SA, Rohrich RJ, Baumann L, Brandt FS, Fagien S, Glazer S, Kenkel JM, Lowe NJ, Monheit GD, Narins RS, Rendon MI, Werschler WP. Subject global evaluation and subject satisfaction using injectable poly-L-lactic acid versus human collagen for the correction of nasolabial fold wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr;127(4):1684-1692. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d371.
PMID: 21460676DERIVEDNarins RS, Baumann L, Brandt FS, Fagien S, Glazer S, Lowe NJ, Monheit GD, Rendon MI, Rohrich RJ, Werschler WP. A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of injectable poly-L-lactic acid versus human-based collagen implant in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Mar;62(3):448-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.040.
PMID: 20159311DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Phyllis Diener, MT, ASCP
Sanofi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2007
First Posted
March 7, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Study Completion
January 1, 2007
Last Updated
September 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09