The Association Between Decreasing Labor Analgesia Epidural Infusion and Forceps Delivery
A Retrospective Case-controlled Study of the Association Between Request to Discontinue Second Stage Labor Epidural Analgesia and Risk of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery
1 other identifier
observational
2,162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study will be to compare epidural infusion management, specifically looking at infusion rate changes, in patients who receive forceps deliveries versus normal spontaneous vaginal deliveries. We will match patients based on time and date of delivery, as well as parity, in order to eliminate these variables as potential con-founders. We hypothesize patients who require a decrease in their basal labor analgesia epidural infusion rate will have an increased incidence of forceps delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2006
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 21, 2011
CompletedApril 14, 2014
March 1, 2014
2 months
March 2, 2007
May 9, 2011
March 17, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Parturients With a Decrease in the Infusion of Epidural Analgesia During Second Stage of Labor
At the request of the obstetric provider, second stage analgesia density was decreased by decreasing the basal infusion rate if there was dissatisfaction with the progress of labor or a perceived inability to push. The basal infusion was never totally discontinued.
Second stage of labor up to 3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Breakthrough Pain in the First Stage of Labor
Supplemental analgesia in first stage of labor (<24 hours)
Duration of Labor Analgesia
Time form initiation of labor analgesia to delivery (up to 24 hours)
Study Arms (2)
Instrumental Vaginal Delivery (IVD)
Instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) is attempted to prevent fetal hypoxia if the second stage of labor is prolonged. It includes forceps and vacuum extractions.
Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (SVD)
The control group consisted of parturients who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD)in the same 24 hour period who were case-matched for gravidity and parity.
Interventions
A retrospective study utilizing the Obstetric Anesthesiology Database to identify parturients who received neuraxial labor analgesia initiated with a combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique and maintained with a continuous epidural infusion with patient controlled epidural analgesia boluses
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant Women
You may qualify if:
- Singletons
- Viable fetal vaginal deliveries between January 2004-October 2005
You may not qualify if:
- Outside specified time frame
- Multiparity
- Fetal demise
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (11)
Murphy DJ. Failure to progress in the second stage of labour. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;13(6):557-61. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200112000-00002.
PMID: 11707657BACKGROUNDComparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001 Jul 7;358(9275):19-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05251-X.
PMID: 11454372BACKGROUNDTorvaldsen S, Roberts CL, Bell JC, Raynes-Greenow CH. Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004457.pub2.
PMID: 15495111BACKGROUNDHess PE, Pratt SD, Soni AK, Sarna MC, Oriol NE. An association between severe labor pain and cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):881-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00020.
PMID: 10735793BACKGROUNDCohen SE, Yeh JY, Riley ET, Vogel TM. Walking with labor epidural analgesia: the impact of bupivacaine concentration and a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose. Anesthesiology. 2000 Feb;92(2):387-92. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00019.
PMID: 10691224BACKGROUNDPanni MK, Segal S. Local anesthetic requirements are greater in dystocia than in normal labor. Anesthesiology. 2003 Apr;98(4):957-63. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200304000-00024.
PMID: 12657859BACKGROUNDYancey MK, Zhang J, Schweitzer DL, Schwarz J, Klebanoff MA. Epidural analgesia and fetal head malposition at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):608-12. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01230-8.
PMID: 11275036BACKGROUNDWong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, Yaghmour E, Marcus RJ, Sherwani SS, Sproviero MT, Yilmaz M, Patel R, Robles C, Grouper S. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 17;352(7):655-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042573.
PMID: 15716559BACKGROUND9. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Sullivan JT, Ebarvia MJ, McCarthy RJ. The risk of cesarean delivery with early neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous induction of labor. http://www.asa-abstracts.com 2007:A1204.
BACKGROUNDBen-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, Yogev Y. Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;197(3):308.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051.
PMID: 17826432BACKGROUNDZiadeh S, Yahaya A. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001 Mar;265(1):30-3. doi: 10.1007/s004040000122.
PMID: 11327090BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The retrospective design incurs the risk of unrecorded or unobserved data. The sample selected included all patients with neuraxial analgesia who underwent IVD, but a limited sample of SVD.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Robert J. McCarthy, PharmD
- Organization
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cynthia A Wong, M.D.
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2007
First Posted
March 6, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2006
Study Completion
March 1, 2006
Last Updated
April 14, 2014
Results First Posted
July 21, 2011
Record last verified: 2014-03