Safety Study of Varisolve® Procedure for Treatment of Varicose Veins in Patients With Right-to-left Cardiac Shunt
MRI
An Open Label Multicenter Safety Study of the Varisolve® Procedure for the Treatment of Varicose Veins in Patients With Right-to-left Cardiac Shunt
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of the Varisolve® procedure in patients with right-to-left cardiac shunt (a defect in the heart).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2007
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 26, 2014
CompletedApril 21, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.3 years
February 27, 2007
January 7, 2014
April 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patients With Circulating MCA Bubbles Present on MRI Who Had Signficant Clinical or Neurological Effects
28 day followup
Study Arms (1)
1
EXPERIMENTALPolidocanol (1%) Microfoam (Varisolve)
Interventions
Varisolve polidocanol 1% microfoam, maximum of 20ml injected into affected great saphenous vein.
Varisolve® polidocanol microfoam injection under duplex guidance to fill proximal and distal great saphenous vein and varicose tributaries.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females aged 18 to 60 with severe varicose veins, CEAP classes 3, 4 and 5 (CEAP is a classification and grading system for chronic venous disease)
- Saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) incompetence. Retrograde blood flow in the GSV, greater than or equal to 1.0 second demonstrated by duplex scanning.
- Normal MRI, as assessed on MRI examination performed within 5 days prior to procedure.
- Patient must be willing and able to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of venous ulcers (i.e. CEAP classification C6) or local infection in the limb to be treated.
- Incompetence of the small saphenous vein (SSV) in the leg to be treated. Venographic or ultrasonographic evidence of current or previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (see Appendix IV).
- Deep venous occlusion and/or incompetence. Evidence of deep venous reflux is acceptable if it is confined to a limited segment caused by filling of the incompetent superficial system through a perforator or the SFJ.
- Patients with known atherosclerotic disease or presence of major risk factors, including LDL cholesterol greater than 130 mg/dl, blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg systolic or 90 mmHg diastolic, or diabetes requiring treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin.
- Smokers.
- History suggestive of cerebral atherosclerosis, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, presence of carotid bruit or history of abnormal carotid duplex examination.
- Clinically significant dilated cardiomyopathy, evidence of regional wall motion abnormalities suggestive of prior myocardial infarction, rheumatic mitral valve disease, moderately severe or worsening cardiac valvular disease (\> 2+ on a scale of 4), known or suspected congenital heart disease, evidence of right sided volume or pressure overload, history of atrial fibrillation. Patients with PFO, atrial septal defect, or other right-to-left shunt are not excluded unless associated with other abnormalities as above.
- Peripheral vascular disease.
- Spontaneous emboli seen on TCD prior to contrast injection.
- Body Mass Index \>30.0.
- Recent or current upper respiratory tract illness or other cause of increased coughing.
- Arterial insufficiency in the leg to be treated (ankle: brachial pressure ratio less than 0.9).
- Reduced mobility - unable to maintain a brisk walk unaided for a minimum of 5 minutes per hour per day.
- Prolonged automobile or air travel (\>4 hours) 1 month prior to treatment, or planned within 1 month of proposed treatment.
- Current or prior pulmonary embolism.
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David DI Wright MB BS
- Organization
- BTG International Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janet Rush, MD
BTG International Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2007
First Posted
March 1, 2007
Study Start
March 1, 2007
Primary Completion
June 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Results First Posted
February 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2021-04