NCT00442286

Brief Summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the Rheos system in subjects with hypertension that are resistant to treatment with at least three anti-hypertension agents, one of which is a diuretic.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
591

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable hypertension

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2006

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hypertension

Geographic Reach
3 countries

44 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2006

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 27, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 1, 2007

Completed
8.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 20, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9.3 years

First QC Date

February 27, 2007

Results QC Date

November 18, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

HypertensionHigh Blood PressureBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseaseResistant HypertensionStage 2 HypertensionHypertension that is resistant to treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Percent of Patients With a 10mmHg or Greater Reduction in Office Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure

    Compare Group A (Rheos® Device On ) versus Group B (Rheos® Device Off) via a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, super-superiority design for proportion of subjects that achieve at least a 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure at Month 6 compared to Month 0, with a superiority margin of 20%.

    6 months post-activation

  • Percent of Group A (Rheos® Device On) Patients Who Maintain a 10 mm Hg Drop in Systolic Blood Pressure at 12 Months Post-activation, and Whose Response at 12 Months is at Least 50% of the Response Observed at 6 Months Post-activation.

    Compare the sustained response in SBP Month 12 in Group A ( Rheos® Device On ) responders at Month 6 to an objective performance criterion of 65%. A sustained response to therapy required the reduction from Month 0 to Month 12 to be at least 10 mmHg and to remain at least 50% of that seen at Month 6.

    12 months post-activation

  • Serious Procedure- or System-related Adverse Event-free Rate in Both Implanted and Attempted Patients

    Compare the serious procedure- or system-related adverse event-free rate for events occurring within 30 days of implant to a pre-specified objective performance criterion of 82% set based on historical literature on implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and pacemakers. Note: The purpose of this outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of having the device implanted, not to compare the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both groups were analyzed as a single cohort.

    30 days post implant

  • Major Hypertension-related and Serious Device-related Adverse Event-Free Rate in Both Implanted and Attempted Patients.

    Compare the event-free rate for all major hypertension-related and serious device-related adverse events occurring between 30 days post-implant and the Month 12 visit, to a pre-specified objective performance criterion of 72% based on similar implantable devices such as defibrillators and resynchronization devices. Note: The purpose of this outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of having the device implanted, not to compare the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both groups were analyzed as a single cohort.

    12 months-post activation

  • Therapy-related Adverse Event-free Rate.

    Compare Group A (Rheos® Device On ) versus Group B (Rheos® Device Off) therapy-related adverse event-free rates via a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, non-inferiority design for therapy-related serious adverse events occurring between 30 days post-implant and the Month 6 visit. The non-inferiority margin was 15%.

    6 months post-activation

Study Arms (2)

On

EXPERIMENTAL

Subject will be randomized to a 2:1 allocation to the Rheos ON or OFF arms at the time of Rheos System activation (time point 0). After the six month follow up evaluation, all subjects will have therapy activated, though subjects and treating physicians will not be informed of randomized treatment assignment.

Device: Rheos® Baroreflex Hypertension System

Off

EXPERIMENTAL

Subject will be randomized to a 2:1 allocation to the Rheos ON or OFF arms at the time of Rheos System activation (time point 0). After the six month follow up evaluation, all subjects will have therapy activated, though subjects and treating physicians will not be informed of randomized treatment assignment.

Device: Rheos® Baroreflex Hypertension System

Interventions

Electrical activation of the Carotid Baroreflex

OffOn

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be at least 21 years of age and no more than 80 years of age.
  • Have been assessed with bilateral carotid bifurcations that are easily interrogated by carotid duplex ultrasound and are below the level of the mandible.
  • Office cuff systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mmHg and have a diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 80 mmHg as well as a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 135 mmHg despite at lest one month of maximally tolerated therapy with at least three anti-hypertensive medications, of which at least one must be a diuretic.
  • Must have completed the drug compliance questionnaire and have been judged to be compliant with medications.
  • For subjects that have had prior bariatric surgery, they must be at least 1 year post-surgery and at a stable weight.
  • If female, the subject must be surgically sterile, or using a medically accepted method of birth control and agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the trial. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test in the pre-implant blood evaluation.
  • Must be an appropriate or reasonable surgical candidate.
  • Have signed a CVRx approved informed consent form for participation in this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Have known or suspected baroreflex failure or autonomic neuropathy.
  • Have an arm circumference greater than 46 cm and/or body mass index of greater than 45.
  • Have significant cardiac bradyarrhythmias.
  • Have chronic atrial fibrillation.
  • Have significant orthostatic hypotension
  • Had a solid organ or hematologic transplant.
  • Had a myocardial infarction, unstable angina, syncope, or cerebral vascular accident within the past 3 months.
  • Have carotid atherosclerosis producing a 50% or greater reduction in linear diameter as determined by ultrasound or angiographic evaluation as determined within 6 months of enrollment in the trial.
  • Have ulcerative plaques in the carotid artery as determined by ultrasound or angiographic evaluation.
  • Have prior surgery, radiation, or endovascular stent placement in either carotid sinus region.
  • Have severe chronic kidney disease as defined by:
  • Currently undergoing dialysis or dialysis is planned within 3 months of the implant date
  • eGFR of ≤30 ml/min/1.73m²
  • Have hypertension secondary to an identifiable and treatable cause other than sleep apnea.
  • Have clinically significant cardiac structural valvular disease.
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (44)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Apex Cardiology

Inglewood, California, 90301, United States

Location

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

Location

St Joseph Health

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

George Washington University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States

Location

VA Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422, United States

Location

Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research

Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States

Location

Florida Hospital Cardiovascular Institute

Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States

Location

Pensacola Research Consultants

Pensacola, Florida, 32504, United States

Location

The Heart and Vascular Institute of Florida

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709, United States

Location

Florida Cardiovascular Institute

Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States

Location

Southeast Regional Research Group

Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States

Location

University of Chicago, Dept. of Medicine, Section of Endocinology, Diabetes & Metabolism

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

Location

The Care Group

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290, United States

Location

Iowa Heart Center

West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266, United States

Location

The Center for Cardiovascular Studies, LLC

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204, United States

Location

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States

Location

Brigham & Womens Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Nebraska Heart Institute

Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526, United States

Location

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States

Location

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, 14623, United States

Location

Rex HealthCare

Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States

Location

Forsyth Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

The Lindner Clinical Trial Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States

Location

Ohio State Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

Jobst Vascular Center

Toledo, Ohio, 43606, United States

Location

Oklahoma Foundation for Cardiovascular Research

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States

Location

Lancaster General Hospital

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604, United States

Location

Temple University Health System

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States

Location

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States

Location

Sanford Clinical Research

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104, United States

Location

Clinical Research Solutions, P.C.

Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States

Location

Saint Thomas Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, 37205, United States

Location

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Scott and White Memoral Hospital

Temple, Texas, 76508, United States

Location

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States

Location

Swedish Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States

Location

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, Germany

Location

University Hospital Maastricht

Maastricht, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Wachter R, Halbach M, Bakris GL, Bisognano JD, Haller H, Beige J, Kroon AA, Nadim MK, Lovett EG, Schafer JE, de Leeuw PW. An exploratory propensity score matched comparison of second-generation and first-generation baroreflex activation therapy systems. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Feb;11(2):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

  • de Leeuw PW, Alnima T, Lovett E, Sica D, Bisognano J, Haller H, Kroon AA. Bilateral or unilateral stimulation for baroreflex activation therapy. Hypertension. 2015 Jan;65(1):187-92. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04492. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypertensionCardiovascular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President of Clinical Research
Organization
CVRx

Study Officials

  • Luis Sanchez, MD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mitra Nadim, MD

    University of Southern California

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2007

First Posted

March 1, 2007

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 20, 2017

Results First Posted

March 20, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Locations