Real-World Benefit From Directional Hearing Aids
1 other identifier
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Directional microphone hearing aids have been shown to provide benefit for individuals with hearing loss in a number of laboratory experiments. However, few studies have investigated the real-world, subject-reported benefit from these hearing aids, and even fewer have examined directional hearing aid benefit across varying degrees of hearing loss. This study will summarize data from a three-year, multi-faceted study of directional hearing aid benefit. Ninety four subjects were divided into three hearing loss groups (normal-to-moderate, mild-to-moderately-severe, and moderate-to-profound). These subjects were then fit with experimental hearing aids set to either directional or omnidirectional mode to determine if significant differences were present in hearing aid outcomes (both subjective and objective). Both subject and experimenter were blinded to the hearing aid settings. Following one month of use in each experimental setting, subjects completed: probe microphone measurements, speech understanding in noise testing, use questionnaires, subjective benefit scales, and satisfaction scales. At the conclusion of the study, subjects rated their preferences for the experimental settings in quiet, noise and overall. Both objective measures, as well as subjective data, were analyzed across hearing aid and hearing loss conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2001
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2001
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2007
CompletedNovember 22, 2016
November 1, 2016
2.9 years
December 5, 2006
November 18, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Probe microphone measurements
Speech understanding in noise
Hearing aid use time
Hearing aid benefit
Hearing aid preference
Hearing aid satisfaction
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- subjects were recruited for participation in this study, thirty-five in each of three hearing loss groups.
- Subjects were assigned to the three groups according to the severity of their hearing losses.
- Group 1 (mild) subjects exhibited normal sloping to moderately severe SNHL, with Pure Tone Averages (PTAs) at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz of less than 35 dB HL.
- Group 2 (moderate) consisted of subjects with mild sloping to moderately severe SNHL with PTAs of 35 to 50 dB HL.
- Group 3 (severe) subjects exhibited moderately-severe, sloping to severe-profound SNHL, with PTAs of greater than 50.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt Universitylead
- VA Office of Research and Developmentcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gnewikow D, Ricketts T, Bratt GW, Mutchler LC. Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(5):603-18. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.03.0052.
PMID: 19882494DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Gnewikow, Ph.D.
Vanderbilt University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2006
First Posted
February 22, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2001
Primary Completion
March 1, 2004
Study Completion
March 1, 2004
Last Updated
November 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11