NCT00427778

Brief Summary

This study aims as defining success rate of the incontinence ring in women with test proven stress urinary incontinence and determining factors associated with successful use.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
29

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2006

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2006

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2007

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2008

Completed
9.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 27, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

January 25, 2007

Results QC Date

November 29, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

incontinence ringpessaryurinary incontinenceurodynamic studyquality of lifecrossover trialrandomised trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With 50% or More Reduction in Number of Incontinence Episode Per Week

    number of women who experienced 50% or more reduction in number of incontinence episode per week on diary while using the incontinence ring, compared to baseline period.

    baseline and 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Score on Question 3 of UDI 6

    4 weeks

  • UDI Overall Score

    4 weeks

  • Objective Cure Rate

    4 weeks

  • Urodynamic Effect of the Incontinence Ring on Flow Rate

    baseline and at 4 weeks of ring use.

  • Impact on I-QOL

    4 weeks

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Incontinence ring then no intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants first were fitted with an incontinence ring, which they wore continuously for 4 weeks. The ring wa then removed and a washout period of 2 weeks followed. Then the second 4-week period with no ring was completed.

Device: incontinence ring

No intervention then incontinence ring

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants spend the first study 4-week period with no intervention. Then, a wasout period of 2 weeks followed. Participants were then fitted with an incontinence ring, which they wore continuously for 4 weeks.

Device: incontinence ring

Interventions

Incontinence ring fitted to patient's anatomy (by choosing appropriate size). It is worn continually for the duration of the treatment period. Intravaginal incontinence ring placed proximally in the posterior vaginal fornix. Knob located at mid-urethra.

Also known as: Silicone Flexible Pessary, Milex code: KPCON
Incontinence ring then no interventionNo intervention then incontinence ring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptoms of urinary stress urinary incontinence (i.e. urinary leakage associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure/cough) (if mixed incontinence the urinary stress urinary incontinence symptoms must predominate)
  • Urodynamic Stress urinary incontinence confirmed by urodynamic studies (i.e. urinary leakage associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure/cough in the absence of detrusor overactivity)
  • Ability to understand spoken and written English

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe pelvic organ prolapse (\> or = stage 3 on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System - POP-Q)
  • Contraindications to pessary use (including acute vaginal/urinary or pelvic infections, vaginal or cervical lesions or unexplained vaginal bleeding)
  • Inability to properly fit the incontinence ring

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, K7L2V7, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

small sample size. slow recruitment

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Marie-Andree Harvey
Organization
Queen's University

Study Officials

  • Marie-Andree Harvey, MD MSc

    Queen's University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2007

First Posted

January 29, 2007

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion

April 1, 2008

Study Completion

May 1, 2008

Last Updated

September 27, 2017

Results First Posted

September 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations