Randomized Placebo Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Investigating GW876008 In Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
A Phase 2 PoC in IBS Patients With the CRF1 Receptor Anatgonist, GSK876008
1 other identifier
interventional
133
2 countries
23
Brief Summary
This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover study to investigate the efficacy and safety of GW876008
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2006
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 14, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 25, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 25, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 26, 2017
CompletedJanuary 31, 2018
November 1, 2017
1.7 years
January 10, 2007
July 28, 2017
January 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants With Average Adequate Relief Rate During the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Periods (Weeks 3-6. in Period 1, Weeks 12-15 in Period 2).
For the assessment of average adequate relief rate from IBS symptoms for a participant was planned by collecting the response of a question 'In the past seven days have you had adequate relief of your IBS pain or discomfort? However, in error, the question was not collected in the IVRS system. Therefore, data for this endpoints was not collected during this study.
Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6. in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Number of Participants With Changes in Weekly Adequate Relief Rates During the Treatment Periods (Weeks 1-6 in Period 1 and Weeks 9-15 in Period 2).
For the assessment of changes in weekly adequate relief rates during the treatment periods was planned by collecting the response of a question. Overall response was defined as having achieved adequate relief in last 4 weeks. However, in error, the question was not collected in the IVRS system. Therefore, data for this endpoints was not collected during this study.
Up to Day 105 (weeks 1-6 in period 1 and weeks 9-15 in period 2).
Number of Participants With Adequate Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort on All 4 of the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Phase Treatment Periods 1 and 2
For the assessment of average adequate relief rate from IBS symptoms for a participant was planned by collecting the response of a question whether weekly adequate relief from IBS symptoms was achieved?. However, in error, the question was not collected in the IVRS system. Therefore, data for this endpoints was not collected during this study.
Up to Day 105
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by Regimen
The GIS is comprised of ten questions, all rated on a seven point scale ranging from substantially worse (7) to substantially improved (1). GIS assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician on a 7-point scale: 1: very much improved; 2: much improved; 3: minimally improved; 4: no change; 5: minimally worse; 6: much worse; or 7: very much worse for diarrhea, constipation, stool frequency, stool consistency, urgency, bloating, incomplete evacuation, and straining. Values reported are less than the minimum score on scale as the rate is the proportion of the last four weeks that the participant is a responder.
Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Ratings on Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBSQoL) Scale
The IBSQoL is a self-report quality-of-life measure specific to IBS that can be used to assess the impact of IBS and its treatment. The IBSQoL consists of 30 statements about bowel problems, which formed 9 scales: emotional health, mental health, health belief, sleep, energy, physical functioning, diet, social role, physical role and sexual relation. All 9 scales were rated on a five-point response scale ranging from 1 (always) to 5 (never). Scores for individual items were averaged to obtain a total score for each subscale of IBSQoL. Then transformed to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation with higher scores indicating better IBS-specific quality of life. Transformed scale score = (raw score - lowest possible scale score)/ (scale range) X 100. The data presented for individual scale.
Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With Improvements in Pain and Discomfort
Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Change From Baseline in Pain Severity Scores
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Percentages of Pain-free Days
Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Number of Participants With Improvements in Bowel Function and Changes in Individual Bowel Symptoms/Function
Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Plasma Concentrations of GW876008 at Week 3 and 6
Week 3 and 6 visits. Pre-dose [after the pre Electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement and just before am dose] and immediately following the 1-3 hour post-dose ECG measurement
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
GW876008
EXPERIMENTALGW876008
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject has been diagnosed with IBS consistent with the Rome II Criteria as adapted in Appendix 3 of the protocol
- The subject has normal results from a flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or a flexible sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema, according to subject's age, within 5 years of randomization. Otherwise, the appropriate procedure(s) must be performed and normal results obtained during the 7-day procedure window (prior to randomization):
- If the subject is \< 50 years of age and has not had a colonic examination within 5 years of the Screening Visit, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy must be performed.
- If the subject is = 50 years of age and has not had a colonic examination within 5 years of the Screening Visit, a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema must be performed.
- Colonic procedure results must be known prior to randomization into the study and dispensing study medication
- During the two-week screening phase, the subject must have conducted self assessments on = 10 days of 14 day (with 80% compliance on daily IVRS calls) compliance assessment using the telephone data entry system
You may not qualify if:
- As a result of any of the medical interview, physical examination, evaluation of mental state and psychiatric history or screening investigations the physician
- Subject reported no stool for 7 consecutive days during the two-week screening phase responsible considers the subject unfit for the study
- The subject has a concurrent illness or disability that may affect the interpretation of clinical data, or otherwise contraindicates participation in this clinical study (e.g., an unstable cardiovascular, autoimmune, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, endocrine, metabolic, gastrointestinal, haematological, or neurological condition).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (23)
GSK Investigational Site
Sherwood, Arkansas, 72120, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Concord, California, 94520, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5S4, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1N2, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M3N 2V7, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 4L6, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 1J5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2007
First Posted
January 12, 2007
Study Start
October 14, 2006
Primary Completion
June 25, 2008
Study Completion
June 25, 2008
Last Updated
January 31, 2018
Results First Posted
December 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11