Protein-Bound Uremic Retention Solutes in Long Nocturnal Hemodialysis
A Multicentric Observational Study on the Removal of Protein-Bound Uremic Retention Solutes in Nocturnal Hemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
1 other identifier
observational
120
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
Although remarkable progress has been made, chronic kidney disease still poses a major burden on both individual patients, as well as on society as a whole. There is a strong inverse relationship between decreasing renal function, as estimated by glomerular filtration rate, and mortality rate, especially death due to cardiovascular disease. The exact cause(s) remain to be elucidated. Uremic toxins might play an important role. In the course of decreasing renal function the concentration of numerous intracellular and extracellular compounds vary from the non-uremic state. But still increasing number of uremic retention solutes are being identified. Renal replacement strategies aim to remove potentially harmful substances from the body. Traditionally much attention has been paid to small water-soluble molecules such as urea nitrogen and creatinine. Based on the results of the recent HEMO and ADEMEX studies, increases of small water-soluble solute removal above the level reached with modern dialysis techniques - hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis (HD, PD) - seem not to be advantageous with regard to patient outcome. These findings may point to the importance of other distinct groups of uremic retention solutes. In view of the data described above, protein-bound solutes might be good candidates. Several advantages of long duration hemodialysis have been observed, including a better control of blood pressure by decreasing extracellular fluid volume, lowering peripheral vascular resistance and improving endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation. A normalization of heart rate variability and improvement of left-ventricular function was noted as well. Furthermore, anemia control has been shown to be easier and several nutritional parameters improved in patients treated with long duration HD. The therapy results in higher small water-soluble solute removal, phosphate removal and greater elimination of larger molecules (e.g. β2-microglobulin). It seems an appealing question whether a better control of the serum levels of protein-bound solutes can be achieved by long duration (nocturnal) hemodialysis. This might be another advantage of this therapeutic modality, or may even in part explain the better outcome of patients treated this way. The study compares intermittent hemodialysis with long nocturnal hemodialysis with respect to serum concentrations of several protein bound uremic toxins, as well as solute removal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2006
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedMarch 5, 2009
March 1, 2009
2 years
December 28, 2006
March 4, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
removal of protein-bound retention solutes
1 dialysis session
Study Arms (4)
1
hemodialysis twice weekly 4 hours
2
nocturnal dialysis twice weekly 8 hours
3
nocturnal hemodialysis, 8 hours every other night
4
nocturnal hemodialysis, 8 hours, six times per week
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Maintenance hemodialysis patients
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Maintenance hemodialysis (\> 3 months duration)
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- No consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
Geelong Hospital
Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, Limburg, 3500, Belgium
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Bammens B, Evenepoel P, Keuleers H, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y. Free serum concentrations of the protein-bound retention solute p-cresol predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006 Mar;69(6):1081-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000115.
PMID: 16421516BACKGROUNDFagugli RM, De Smet R, Buoncristiani U, Lameire N, Vanholder R. Behavior of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uremic solutes during daily hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Aug;40(2):339-47. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34518.
PMID: 12148107BACKGROUNDPierratos A. Daily nocturnal home hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2004 May;65(5):1975-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00603.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 15086951BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
serum, urine, dialysate
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Björn KI Meijers, MD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pieter Evenepoel, MD, PhD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tom Dejagere, MD
Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nigel Toussaint, MD
Geelong Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2006
First Posted
December 29, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 5, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-03