Recovery of Visual Acuity in People With Vestibular Deficits
Recovery of Visual Acuity in Vestibular Deficits
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether exercises relieve the symptoms of dizziness and imbalance in people with vestibular deficits and improves the ability to see clearly during head movements. We hypothesize that the performance of specific adaptation and substitution exercises will result in an improvement in visual acuity during head movements while those patients performing placebo exercises will show no improvement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2000
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2000
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2006
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 21, 2014
CompletedAugust 7, 2015
July 1, 2015
4.3 years
December 12, 2006
December 20, 2013
July 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Visual Acuity During Head Movement From Baseline to Discharge
visual acuity is measured using a computerized system first with the head stationary and then with the head moving in yaw plane. Head velocity is measured using a rate sensor and optotype is displayed only when head velocity is between 120 and 180 degrees per second. The change in visual acuity was calculated from subtracting the discharge measurement from the baseline measurement (pre-intervention).
pre-intervention and at discharge
Subjective Complaints: (All Pre- and Post-intervention):
questionnaire
pre-intervention, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and at discharge
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Disability Scale
pre-intervention, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and at discharge
Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale
pre-intervention, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and at discharge
Symptoms Intensity for Dizziness, Oscillopsia, Disequilibrium
pre-intervention, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and at discharge
Balance and Gait
pre-intervention, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and at discharge
Fall Risk (Dynamic Gait Index)
pre-intervention, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and at discharge
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
exercises for gaze stabilization
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group performed vestibular adaptation and substitution exercises
Control exercises
PLACEBO COMPARATORSaccadic eye movements against a Ganzfeld to prevent retinal slip error signal; no head movements
Interventions
saccadic eye movements against a plain background; no head movements
adaptation and substitutin exercises encorporating retinal lsip and head movements
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient had to have either a unilateral vestibular or bilateral vestibular hypofunction defined as follows: Unilateral vestibular deficits were defined by a \> 25% difference in slow phase eye velocity between right and left sides on either the caloric or rotary chair test. Bilateral vestibular deficits were defined included refixation saccades made in response to unpredictable head thrusts to the right and left, a gain \< .1 on rotary chair step test and a peak slow phase eye movement of \<5 degrees/sec during irrigation of each ear on bithermal water caloric testing
- Healthy subjects with normal vestibular function test results
- must be able to complete DVA test
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with central lesions will be omitted from the study because vestibular adaptation or other compensatory mechanisms may be compromised and
- Patients with visual acuity when the head is stationary of 20/60 or worse.
- Patients on medication that suppress or facilitate vestibular function will not be excluded from the study but data will be analyzed to assess the effect of medication.
- Patient who do not understand the purpose of the study and what it involves
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Related Publications (9)
Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ, Blatt P, Suzuki A, Venuto PJ, Roberts D. Computerized dynamic visual acuity test in the assessment of vestibular deficits. Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):790-6.
PMID: 9831156RESULTHerdman SJ, Schubert MC, Tusa RJ. Role of central preprogramming in dynamic visual acuity with vestibular loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Oct;127(10):1205-10. doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.10.1205.
PMID: 11587600RESULTSchubert MC, Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ. Functional measure of gaze stability in patients with vestibular hypofunction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Oct;942:490-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03777.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11710496RESULTSchubert MC, Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ. Vertical dynamic visual acuity in normal subjects and patients with vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol. 2002 May;23(3):372-7. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200205000-00025.
PMID: 11981398RESULTHerdman SJ, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJ. Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Aug;129(8):819-24. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.8.819.
PMID: 12925338RESULTSchubert MC, Das V, Tusa RJ, Herdman SJ. Cervico-ocular reflex in normal subjects and patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Jan;25(1):65-71. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200401000-00013.
PMID: 14724495RESULTHall CD, Schubert MC, Herdman SJ. Prediction of fall risk reduction as measured by dynamic gait index in individuals with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Sep;25(5):746-51. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200409000-00017.
PMID: 15354006RESULTSaleh M, Boukhdoud M, Boukhdoud H, Al Zein M, Salameh P. Landscape of Guillain-Barre Syndrome Interventional Clinical Trials. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):119-129. doi: 10.1097/CND.0000000000000441.
PMID: 36809199DERIVEDHerdman SJ, Hall CD, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJ. Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Apr;133(4):383-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.4.383.
PMID: 17438254DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Susan J Herdman, PT, PhD
- Organization
- Emory
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan J Herdman, PhD
Emory University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2006
First Posted
December 13, 2006
Study Start
August 1, 2000
Primary Completion
December 1, 2004
Study Completion
December 1, 2004
Last Updated
August 7, 2015
Results First Posted
July 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2015-07