NCT00406133

Brief Summary

Subjects with intensively-treated type 1 diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0%-10.0% in 3 age groups (\>25, 15-24, 8-14) will be randomized to a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) group or control group. The primary outcome is change in HbA1c after 26 weeks. A parallel randomized trial is being conducted for a second cohort with HbA1c \<7.0% that will follow an identical protocol to that of the first cohort with HbA1c \>=7.0%. The \>=7.0% trial was specifically designed and statistically powered to compare separately the impact of continuous versus standard intensive glucose monitoring in the three age groups. Both trials used standardized treatment algorithms and equivalent frequent contacts with subjects in both the CGM and control group. After completion of the 26-week trial, the CGM group continues to use CGM for another 26 weeks to evaluate whether any beneficial effect seen in the first 6 months is sustained with longer-term use and less intensive contact and the control group initiates CGM use with less intensive contact after the first month than was provided at initiation of CGM use in the CGM group in the randomized trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
451

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2006

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2006

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2006

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2006

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2008

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 2, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2006

Results QC Date

May 11, 2009

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Control Groups (for the Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0% Cohort)

    The primary outcome was the Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 26 weeks, as determined by a central laboratory (for the cohort with baseline HbA1c \>=7.0% cohort).

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Time With Glucose Level <=70 mg/dL (for the Cohort With Baseline HbA1c <7.0%)

    The primary outcome was the change in the time per day with glucose values \<=70mg/dL comparing baseline sensor values with those obtained following the 26-week visit.

    Baseline and 26 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Severe Hypoglycemia (for the Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0% Cohort)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Minutes Per Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Glucose Values 71-180 mg/dL (for the Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0% Cohort)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Minutes Per Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Glucose Values >180 mg/dL (for the Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0% Cohort)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Minutes Per Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Glucose Values >250 mg/dL (for the Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0% Cohort

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Minutes Per Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Glucose Values <=70 mg/dL (for Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0%)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Relative Decrease in A1c Level by >=10% (for Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0%)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Relative Increase in A1c Level by >=10% (for Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0%)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • Relative Decrease in A1c Level by >=0.5% (for Cohort With Baseline HbA1c >=7.0%)

    Baseline and 26 weeks

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard intensive glucose monitoring

NO INTERVENTION

Patients in the control group were given blood glucose meters and test strips and asked to perform home blood glucose monitoring at least four times daily.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the CGM group were instructed to use the CGM device on a daily basis and to verify the accuracy of the glucose measurement with a home blood glucose meter (provided by the study) before making management decisions (as per the regulatory labeling of the devices).

Device: Continuous glucose monitor

Interventions

Daily use of a continuous glucose monitor

Also known as: Abbott FreeStyle Navigator, DexCom SEVEN, Medtronic Paradigm REAL-Time
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and using daily insulin therapy for at least one year
  • The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is based on the investigator's judgment; C peptide level and antibody determinations are not needed.
  • Age \>8 years
  • Glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c) 7.0%-10.0% for the primary cohort and \<7.0% for the secondary cohort
  • The DCA2000 or comparable point of care device will be used to assess eligibility.
  • Insulin regimen involves either use of an insulin pump or multiple daily injections of insulin (at least 3 shots per day) and has been stable for the last two months, with no plans to switch the modality of insulin administration during the next 6 months (e.g., injection user switching to a pump, pump user switching to injections, or the addition of Lantus (Glargine) insulin)
  • Subjects using premixed fixed doses of insulin at the time of enrollment will not be eligible
  • Subject (and parent/guardian for children) understands the study protocol and agrees to comply with it
  • Subjects \>9 years old and primary care giver (i.e., parent or guardian if subject is a minor) comprehend written English or Spanish
  • This requirement is due to the fact that the questionnaires to be used as outcome measures do not have validated versions in other languages.
  • Spanish-speaking subjects will be enrolled only if a RT-CGM device that functions in Spanish and has a User Guide in Spanish is available.
  • No expectation that subject will be moving out of the area of the clinical center during the next year, unless the move will be to an area served by another study center.
  • Informed Consent Form signed by the subject (or parent/guardian if subject is a minor, with subject signing the Child Assent Form)

You may not qualify if:

  • The presence of a significant medical disorder or use of a medication such as oral/inhaled glucocorticoids that in the judgment of the investigator will affect the wearing of the sensors or the completion of any aspect of the protocol.
  • The presence of any of the following diseases:
  • Asthma if treated with systemic or inhaled corticosteroids in the last 6 months
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Adequately treated thyroid disease and celiac disease do not exclude subjects from enrollment
  • Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months (if the subject is a minor, for either the subject or the subject's primary care giver).
  • Home use of RT-CGM in past 6 months
  • Use of a CGMS or GlucoWatch does not exclude subjects from enrollment
  • Participation in an intervention study (including psychological studies) in past 6 weeks.
  • Another member of the same household is participating in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

University of Southern California

Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States

Location

Kaiser Permanente

San Diego, California, 92111, United States

Location

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

University of Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, 80010, United States

Location

Yale University School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States

Location

Nemours Children's Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States

Location

Atlanta Diabetes Associates

Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Joslin Diabetes Center - Adults

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

Joslin Diabetes Center - Children

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • JDRF CGM Study Group. JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Aug;10(4):310-21. doi: 10.1089/dia.2007.0302.

    PMID: 18828243BACKGROUND
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase HP, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Hirsch IB, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer S, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. Epub 2008 Sep 8.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Beck RW, Hirsch IB, Laffel L, Tamborlane WV, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase P, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer SA, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1378-83. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0108. Epub 2009 May 8.

  • Wilson DM, Xing D, Cheng J, Beck RW, Hirsch I, Kollman C, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Mauras N, Ruedy KJ, Tsalikian E, Wolpert H; Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Persistence of individual variations in glycated hemoglobin: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jun;34(6):1315-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1661. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

  • Xing D, Kollman C, Beck RW, Tamborlane WV, Laffel L, Buckingham BA, Wilson DM, Weinzimer S, Fiallo-Scharer R, Ruedy KJ; Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar;13(3):351-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0156. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Fiallo-Scharer R, Cheng J, Beck RW, Buckingham BA, Chase HP, Kollman C, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Mauras N, Tamborlane WV, Wilson DM, Wolpert H. Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):586-90. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1111. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Wilson DM, Xing D, Beck RW, Block J, Bode B, Fox LA, Hirsch I, Kollman C, Laffel L, Ruedy KJ, Steffes M, Tamborlane WV. Hemoglobin A1c and mean glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):540-4. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1054. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Prolonged nocturnal hypoglycemia is common during 12 months of continuous glucose monitoring in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 May;33(5):1004-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2081. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):17-22. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1502. Epub 2009 Oct 16.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Beck RW, Buckingham B, Miller K, Wolpert H, Xing D, Block JM, Chase HP, Hirsch I, Kollman C, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Milaszewski K, Ruedy KJ, Tamborlane WV. Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):1947-53. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0889. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Bode B, Beck RW, Xing D, Gilliam L, Hirsch I, Kollman C, Laffel L, Ruedy KJ, Tamborlane WV, Weinzimer S, Wolpert H. Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on A1C, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):2047-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0846. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Roy W. Beck, M.D., Ph.D., Director
Organization
Jaeb Center for Health Research

Study Officials

  • Roy W Beck, MD, PhD

    Jaeb Center for Health Research

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Lori Laffel, MD

    Joslin Diabetes Center Pediatric Section

    STUDY CHAIR
  • William V. Tamborlane, MD

    Yale University

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2006

First Posted

December 4, 2006

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion

July 1, 2008

Study Completion

February 1, 2009

Last Updated

April 14, 2017

Results First Posted

September 2, 2009

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations