A Study To Investigate The Effectiveness Of AH234844 (Lavoltidine) Compared With NEXIUM And Ranitidine.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Four Period Cross-over Comparison of the Effect of Two Doses Lavoltidine, Esomeprazole, and Placebo on 24 Hour Gastric pH and Frequency of Heartburn in Symptomatic GERD Subjects Without Esophageal Erosions
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Current treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) confirms an unmet need in patients, based on slow onset of action and an inability to provide 24-hour gastric-acid suppression. Clinical data on AH234844 demonstrates a rapid onset of action, high potency, and prolonged duration of effect. The present study endeavors, in part, to compare lavoltidine to two GERD drugs, NEXIUM and ranitidine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2007
CompletedJanuary 19, 2017
January 1, 2017
10 months
November 27, 2006
January 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pH over 24hours
over 24hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
%24 hours pH>4 Median gastric pH Adverse events
over 24 hours
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject must have a Body Mass Index (BMI) from 19-30 kg/m2
- Subject does not present with abnormal clinical lab findings
- Subject is able to tolerate a nasogastric pH electrode.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is Helicobacter-positive on a C13 urea breath test
- Subject has a baseline median 24-hour gastric pH\>3
- For Part B of the study, subjects are CYP 2C19 poor metabolizers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (2)
GSK Investigational Site
Randwick, New South Wales, 2031, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2006
First Posted
November 29, 2006
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2007
Study Completion
March 1, 2007
Last Updated
January 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01