Efficacy and Safety Study of Esomeprazole 20mg qd vs Ranitidine 150mg Bid in Patients With an NSAID-induced Gastric Ulcer
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group, 8 Week Comparative Efficacy and Safety Study of Esomeprazole 20 mg Every Day (qd) Versus Ranitidine 150 mg Twice a Day (Bid) in Patients With an NSAID-associated Gastric Ulcer When Daily NSAID is Continued
1 other identifier
interventional
397
2 countries
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of esomeprazole 20 mg dosed once daily and ranitidine 150 mg dosed twice daily through 4 weeks of treatment for the healing of gastric ulcers in patients receiving daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2006
Typical duration for phase_3
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 8, 2010
CompletedJuly 8, 2010
June 1, 2010
November 17, 2006
November 12, 2009
June 10, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Percentage of Subjects Whose Gastric Ulcer(s) (GUs) Was (Were) Healed at Week 4 After Treatment With Esomeprazole 20 mg qd and Ranitidine 150 mg Bid in Patients Receiving Daily Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID)Therapy.
Healed was defined as the absence of gastric ulcers. It was calculated as the proportion of subjects whose gastric ulcer(s) healed after 4 weeks treatment. (Ulcers were on S stage, stage 1 = Nonblanchable erythema of intact skin, stage 2 = Partial thickness skin loss involving epidermis, dermis, or both, stage 3 = Full thickness skin loss involving damage to or necrosis of subcutaneous tissue, stage 4 = Full thickness skin loss with extensive destruction, tissue necrosis, or damage to muscle, bone, or supporting structures or absent).
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The Percentage of Subjects Whose Gastric Ulcer(s) Was (Were) Healed at Week 8 After Treatment With Esomeprazole 20 mg qd and Ranitidine 150 mg Bid in Patients Receiving Daily NSAID Therapy.
8 weeks
The Resolution of Heartburn Symptoms at Week 4 and Week 8 After Treatment With Esomeprazole 20 mg qd and Ranitidine 150 mg Bid in Patients Receiving Daily NSAID Therapy.
week 4 and week 8
Percentage of Participants With the Occurance of Any Adverse Event.
8 weeks
The Percentage of Participants Whose Duodenal Ulcer(s) (DUs) Was (Were) Healed at Week 4 and Week 8 After Treatment With Esomeprazole 20 mg qd and Ranitidine 150 mg Bid in Patients Receiving Daily NSAID Therapy.
4 and 8 week
The Percentage of Participants Whose GU(s) and DU(s) in Combination Were Healed at Week 4 and Week 8 After Treatment With Esomeprazole 20 mg qd and Ranitidine 150 mg Bid in Patients Receiving Daily NSAID Therapy
4 & 8 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent.
- A clinical diagnosis of a chronic condition that requires daily NSAID treatment for at least 2 months.
- Daily NSAID dose and type must have been stable for at least 2 weeks prior to the baseline endoscopy;orally;
You may not qualify if:
- History of esophageal, gastric or duodenal surgery, except for simple closure of an ulcer.
- History of severe liver disease, including (but not limited to) cirrhosis and acute or chronic hepatitis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (9)
Research Site
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Research Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Research Site
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Research Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Research Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Research Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Research Site
Beijing, China
Research Site
Shanghai, China
Research Site
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
According to the protocol, the sample size was 320 patients which could achieve 80% power of superiority. Since the patient recruitment is very difficult, total 219 patients were randomized in present study, the power decreased to 60%
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gerard Lynch
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tore Lind, MD
AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2006
First Posted
November 22, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 8, 2010
Results First Posted
July 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-06