Organ Protection for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Propofol Versus Desflurane
A Randomised Controlled Study of Organ Protection Comparing Desflurane and Propofol in Adult Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass
1 other identifier
interventional
182
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Different anaesthetic agents have been shown to have different protective effects upon heart, brain and renal function under ischaemic conditions (oxygen starvation). Cardiopulmonary bypass takes over the work of the heart and the lungs during heart surgery, but oxygenation of vital organs such as the brain and heart may not be perfect, and can produce brain or heart damage as a consequence. Propofol and desflurane are commonly used anaesthetic agents, and there has been recent research to suggest that anaesthetic agents may provide some protection during periods where inadequate oxygenation occurs, with the potential to reduce the degree of organ damage. Both types of anaesthetics are used for cardiac surgery with anaesthetists choosing between them largely on the basis of personal preference. Aim: To determine whether the use of either propofol or desflurane as the primary anaesthetic agent, can lead to differences in postoperative brain function, total morbidity or cost, following coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Patients will be recruited by professional research staff and will be randomised into one of two groups (90 in each group). They will receive a standardized technique for anaesthesia, cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative ICU treatment. The only difference between the 2 groups will be as to which anaesthetic agent they receive during the surgical period, desflurane or propofol. Measurements will involve i) brain function testing before and 3 months after surgery ( a set of 10 verbal or manual tests), ii) incidence of delirium in the immediate postoperative period (a survey form), iii) incidence of total postoperative morbidity and iv) cost of hospital stay. Data collection will be by anaesthesia and research staff and a neuropsychologist will employed for performing the brain function testing. Anticipated timeline: Initial recruitment completed by 15-18 months following trial commencement. Follow up completed 3 month after the last enrolment. Data validation, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation completed by 24 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedJune 29, 2010
January 1, 2010
2.3 years
November 16, 2006
June 28, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative cognitive decline
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Delirium as defined using the Confusion Assessment Method
24 hours
Composite Morbidity
in hospital (average time 6-7 days)
Cost of postoperative care
in hospital
Interventions
Propofol used as the primary anaesthetic agent
Desflurane used as the primary anaesthetic
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Coronary artery bypass surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Off-pump cardiac surgery
- Require surgery for acute coronary syndrome
- Dialysis dependent renal dysfunction
- Severe liver dysfunction as determined by liver transaminases 1.5X greater than normal.
- Pre-existing diagnosis of schizophrenia, dementia recent stroke or cognitive disorder
- Recent alcohol/drug abuse/intoxication
- Re-do Coronary Artery Grafts
- Coronary Artery Grafts plus other surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Melbournelead
- Baxter Healthcare Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3050, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Colin F Royse, MBBS, MD
Melbourne Health and University of Melbourne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2006
First Posted
November 17, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 29, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01