Use of Ointments in Prevention of Catheter Related Infections in PD
A Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study Using Mupirocin Versus Polysporin Triple for the Prevention of Catheter-related Infections in Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in approximately 25% of patients requiring dialysis in Canada. The most common complication is bacterial infection or 'peritonitis'. Peritonitis causes severe acute abdominal pain and may lead to failure of peritoneal dialysis treatment, hospitalization or death, particularly if left untreated. Amongst the strategies used to prevent peritonitis, patients are instructed on the regular use of a prophylactic ointment around the point where the catheter exits from the body. At the present time most centers in Canada routinely prescribe mupirocin ointment for use at the exit site, however newer ointments have become available. One such ointment is Polysporin Triple. The aim of this study is to determine if catheter related infections can be significantly reduced by the routine application of Polysporin Triple in comparison to mupirocin ointment. A multi-centre, randomized, double blind, controlled study is proposed. Participants will be randomized to either mupirocin or Polysporin Triple and followed for 18 months or until the first catheter related infection, death or catheter removal. The difference in catheter related infection rates will be compared between the two groups. We anticipate the results of this study will allow clinicians to prescribe the ointment most likely to reduce infections. By doing so this will reduce the complication rate associated with peritoneal dialysis and, ultimately improve survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedMarch 18, 2015
March 1, 2015
3.3 years
November 15, 2006
March 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint is the time to first catheter related infection.
2Yrs
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Removal of the catheter to prevent or halt progression of a catheter related infection
2 yrs
Hospitalizations related to catheter related infection
2 yrs
Death due to catheter-related infection
2 yrs
All-cause mortality
2yrs
Technique failure (i.e. transfer to hemodialysis)
2yrs
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALPolysporin tRIPLE ointment (topical ointment in widespread use for other skin lesions)
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORMupirocin
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able and willing to provide informed consent\*
- Age over 18 years
- Has a peritoneal dialysis catheter in situ and
- Is established on PD for more than 3 months (prevalent patients)
- Is undergoing training for or has initiated PD within the last 3 months (incident patients)
- Medically stable (as defined by primary nephrologist)
- Regularly applying mupirocin ointment to catheter exit site
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of acute renal failure
- Catheter related infection at the time of recruitment or within the previous 3 months
- Use of an oral or IV antibiotic at the time of randomization or within the previous 1 week.
- Known allergy to any component of gentamicin or mupirocin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Scarborough General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M1P 2V5, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Related Publications (2)
McQuillan RF, Chiu E, Nessim S, Lok CE, Roscoe JM, Tam P, Jassal SV. A randomized controlled trial comparing mupirocin and polysporin triple ointments in peritoneal dialysis patients: the MP3 Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Feb;7(2):297-303. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07970811. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
PMID: 22134627RESULTJassal SV, Lok CE; MP3 Study Group. A randomized controlled trial comparing mupirocin versus Polysporin Triple for the prevention of catheter-related infections in peritoneal dialysis patients (the MP3 study). Perit Dial Int. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):67-72.
PMID: 18178950DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vanita Jassal, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2006
First Posted
November 17, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03