NCT00395681

Brief Summary

Rationale: The extreme increase of obesity in the last years had led to this study. There is no consensus about how to anaesthetise morbidly obese patients. The amounts of narcotics given vary widely and rather depend on the anaesthetist than on the pharmacokinetics and dynamics in the morbidly obese patient. Reason for this is that it is not clear in what extend the pharmacokinetics and dynamics are affected in the morbidly obese patient. Objective: The study is performed in order to develop a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of Propofol when used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in the morbidly obese patient (BMI \> 40). A covariate analysis will be performed in order to account for variability in pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters. This model will take into account patient and procedure bound covariates. The results will be used to develop individualised dosing schemes of Propofol when used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Study design: A randomised, therapeutic and non-invasive study. Study population: Morbidly obese patients with a Body Mass Index \> 40 undergoing laparoscopic banding or gastric bypass surgery, 18-60 year old. Intervention (if applicable): Patients will be randomised into two groups, one group will be given 200 milligrams of Propofol and the other group will be given 350 milligrams of Propofol. During the induction of anaesthesia with Propofol over 60 seconds, the patient is asked to count in order to measure time to induction of anaesthesia. During and following anaesthesia a maximum of 50 ml of blood will be taken from an indwelling arterial line. Depth of sedation will be measured using non-invasive Bispectral Index (target 40-60) and other standard measures (heart frequency and blood pressure). Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoints: pharmacokinetic parameters; clearance, intercompartmental clearance, volume of central compartment and volume of peripheral compartment. Secondary endpoints: pharmacodynamic parameters; time to induction of anaesthesia (stop counting, eyelash reflex, quality of anaesthesia, corresponding dose required for induction of anaesthesia for both induction doses), EC50 using BIS, required doses of Propofol during maintenance of anaesthesia, wake-up time. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation benefit and group relatedness: A maximum amount of 50 milliliters of blood will be sampled from an indwelling arterial line. The patient will be asked to count slowly during induction of anaesthesia. Both induction doses of 200 and 350 milligrams are currently used standard induction doses for morbidly obese patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2006

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2007

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2010

Status Verified

November 1, 2006

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 1, 2006

Last Update Submit

October 21, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

ObesityPropofolMorbidly obeseBMI

Study Arms (2)

propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

propofol 200 mg versus 350 mg

Drug: Diprivan

Propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Propofol 350 mg versus 200 mg

Drug: Diprivan

Interventions

Propofol 200 mg versus 350 mg

Propofolpropofol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a Body Mass Index \> 40 undergoing laparoscopic banding or gastric bypass surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Epilepsy, pregnancy, breastfeeding and known allergy for Propofol, egg lecithin or soy bean oil.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

st. Antonius hospital

Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • van Kralingen S, Diepstraten J, Peeters MY, Deneer VH, van Ramshorst B, Wiezer RJ, van Dongen EP, Danhof M, Knibbe CA. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in morbidly obese patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011 Nov 1;50(11):739-50. doi: 10.2165/11592890-000000000-00000.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity, MorbidObesity

Interventions

Propofol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Simone van Kralingen, resident

    St. Antonius Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2006

First Posted

November 3, 2006

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion

September 1, 2008

Study Completion

September 1, 2008

Last Updated

October 22, 2010

Record last verified: 2006-11

Locations