Multicenter Study of Antiarrhythmic Medications for Treatment of Infants With Supraventricular Tachycardia
1 other identifier
interventional
72
2 countries
14
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-centered study to compare 6 months of medical treatment with digoxin or propranolol in infants with SVT Background: SVT is the most common sustained arrhythmia of infancy. Neither digoxin nor propranolol has been evaluated for pediatric use in a controlled trial in the context of SVT, yet both medications are used frequently. Specific aims of the study: To determine whether propranolol and digoxin differ in the:
- 1.Incidence of recurrent SVT in infants after 6 months of treatment with propranolol or digoxin
- 2.Time to first recurrence of SVT in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin.
- 3.Incidence of adverse outcomes in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_3
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 22, 2013
CompletedDecember 13, 2017
November 1, 2017
3.8 years
October 18, 2006
March 11, 2013
November 16, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Recurrent Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) Requiring Medical Intervention to Terminate the Episode.
6 months or until study endpoints were reached
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Treated Patients Experiencing First SVT Recurrence
up to 110 days of treatment
Incidence of Adverse Outcomes in Infants With Propranolol or Digoxin
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Propranolol
EXPERIMENTALSingle dose of 0.5 mg/kg per dose and increased to 1.0 mg/kg per dose ITD for the second and subsequent doses.
Digoxin
EXPERIMENTALFirst 2 doses at 0.010 mg/kg per dose TID, then 0.0035 mg/kg per dose TID for the third and subsequent doses
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presentation with SVT due to AVRT or AVNRT.
- Age 4 months or less at presentation.
- No major structural heart disease (patent foramen ovale and patent ductus arteriosus are allowable.
- No other significant co-morbid condition likely to result in non-compliance or death in next 6 months.
- The SVT mechanism will be presumed to be AVRT or AVNRT if the ECG shows:
- Normal complex tachycardia with abrupt onset and offset;
- The RR interval remains relatively constant during tachycardia with heart rates of 220-310 bpm;
- VA (ventriculo-atrial) association \[i.e., there is a 1:1 AV relationship (except for cases of proven AV nodal reentry with a 2:1 relationship between atrium and ventricle)\]; and
- Termination of tachycardia with vagal maneuvres or adenosine with AV block or VA block.
- Additional supportive information:
- The presence of a P wave in either the ST segment or T wave, or the presence of a P wave altering the terminal portion of the QRS complex;
- Spontaneous termination of the tachycardia with a P wave;
- Onset with prolongation of the PR interval;
- Altered rate with resolution of temporary bundle branch block;
- Esophageal or electrophysiology study confirming tachycardia mechanism.
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to obtain consent;
- Known hypersensitivity to either study medication or suspension;
- Structural heart disease other than a patent foramen ovale or patent ductus arteriosus;
- Persistent abnormal cardiac function documented by echocardiogram (shortening fraction \<28%) in sinus rhythm;
- Pre-excitation (Wolff Parkinson White syndrome);
- Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia;
- Ectopic atrial tachycardia;
- Atrial flutter;
- Sick sinus syndrome or significant bradycardia;
- Long QT syndrome;
- Digoxin \> 40 micrograms/kg total received within past 7 days
- Amiodarone \>50 milligrams/kg total received within past month
- Asthma or obstructive airway disease;
- Renal failure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- The Hospital for Sick Childrencollaborator
- University of Utahcollaborator
Study Sites (14)
University of Southern California - Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, United States
The Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
Schneider Children's Hospital
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital Ohio
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Medical University of Charleston South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Primary Children's Medical Centre
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Norfolk Children's Hospital of the King's Daughter's
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Northwest Pediatric Cardiology
Spokane, Washington, United States
Stollery children's Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sonia Franciosi
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H3N1, Canada
Hospital for Sick Kids
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHU Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Sanatani S, Potts JE, Reed JH, Saul JP, Stephenson EA, Gibbs KA, Anderson CC, Mackie AS, Ro PS, Tisma-Dupanovic S, Kanter RJ, Batra AS, Fournier A, Blaufox AD, Singh HR, Ross BA, Wong KK, Bar-Cohen Y, McCrindle BW, Etheridge SP. The study of antiarrhythmic medications in infancy (SAMIS): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of digoxin versus propranolol for prophylaxis of supraventricular tachycardia in infants. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):984-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.972620. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
PMID: 22962431DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Besides issues of recruitment, potential limitations of this study include the selected dosing for propranol, as a higher dosage is sometimes used, and the lack of dose titration before the 2-month visit, both of which could influence drug efficacy.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Shubhayan Sanatani
- Organization
- University of British Columbia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shubhayan Sanatani, MD
University of British Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2006
First Posted
October 20, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 13, 2017
Results First Posted
August 22, 2013
Record last verified: 2017-11