Does the Order in Which Vaccines Are Administered Affect Pain Response?
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine whether there should be a predetermined sequence recommended for administering these two vaccines, with the less painful vaccine being given first.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain
Started Jul 2006
Typical duration for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedNovember 13, 2013
November 1, 2013
11 months
October 17, 2006
November 10, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain response to vaccination with Prevnar and Pentacel, as measured by The Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Immediately after vaccination
Study Arms (2)
Pentacel
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subjects in this arm will be vaccinated with Pentacel
Prevnar
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subjects in this arm will be vaccinated with Prevnar
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy infant
- months of age
- receiving primary DPT and PCV vaccinations
You may not qualify if:
- chronic illness
- immune deficiency
- immunosuppression
- a history of allergy to DPT or PCV or any of its components
- fever
- any acute illness that prevents the administration of the vaccine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Ipp M, Parkin PC, Lear N, Goldbach M, Taddio A. Order of vaccine injection and infant pain response. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 May;163(5):469-72. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.35.
PMID: 19414694DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Moshe Ipp, MD
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2006
First Posted
October 19, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
June 1, 2007
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 13, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11