Study Stopped
Few subjects recruited, sponsor withdrew support.
Losartan Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Reversing Remodeling of Small Arteries in Pre-Hypertensive Pre-Diabetic Subjects
Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Design Study Comparing Effectiveness of Losartan vs. Hydrochlorothiazide in Reversing or Preventing the Progression of the Remodeling of Resistance Arteries in Pre-hypertensive Pre-diabetic Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind, parallel group, two-centre pilot study will test the hypothesis that subjects who are otherwise healthy but fulfill the criteria for a diagnosis of pre-hypertension and pre-diabetes will have regression or reduced progression of hypertension-associated changes in their resistance arteries if their blood pressure is controlled for 6 months with losartan, whereas similar subjects whose blood pressure is equally well controlled using hydrochlorothiazide will have significantly less improvement of the changes in their resistance arteries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Mar 2007
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedMay 19, 2015
May 1, 2015
2.8 years
October 13, 2006
May 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of 6 months of losartan or hydrochlorothiazide on media/lumen ratio of gluteal subcutaneous resistance arteries in otherwise normal subjects who fulfill criteria for pre-hypertension and pre-diabetes
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Safety and tolerability of 6 month therapy with losartan or hydrochlorothiazide, and effect on media thickness, lumen diameter and vascular function of gluteal subcutaneous resistance arteries, and serum and tissue inflammatory markers in same subjects
6 months
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALLosartan treatment
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORHydrochlorothiazide, 12.5-25 mg per day once a day for 6 months
Interventions
Losartan, 50-100 mg per day, once a day, for 6 months. Hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5-25 mg per day, once a day, for 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prehypertensive prediabetic subjects (25-70 years old) defined as otherwise normal subjects with a mean SiSBP of 120-139 mmHg and fasting blood glucose of 6.1-6.9 mmol/L or impaired glucose tolerance on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at screening and after two weeks of placebo therapy (Week -2)
You may not qualify if:
- Hypertension or clinically significant renal disease
- Cerebrovascular accident within the past year, or current transient ischemic attacks
- Myocardial infarction within the past year; percutaneous coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery within last 6 months
- Clinically significant AV conduction disturbances and/or arrhythmias (e.g. second- or third-degree AV block; sick-sinus syndrome or clinically significant bradycardia- resting heart rate \< 45 beats/minute), tachyarrhythmias; clinically significant arrhythmias, presence of accessory bypass tract (e.g. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome)
- Angina pectoris
- Current or prior history of heart failure or known left ventricular ejection fraction \<40%
- History of unexplained syncope or known syncopal disorder (e.g., Stokes-Adams Syndrome)
- Known history of hemodynamically significant obstructive valvular disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Use of agents that may cause alteration of blood pressure is prohibited. This includes nitrates, or alpha or beta-blockers. Calcium channel blockers are allowed as second line therapy if hypertension develops during the study Major psychotropic agents and antidepressants are not permitted
- Cimetidine is not permitted (famotidine and ranitidine and proton pump inhibitors are allowed).
- NSAIDs are permitted if taken on a stable regimen. Aspirin in small doses (\< 1 g/day) as cardioprotective agent and acetaminophen are permitted
- Oral or inhaled steroids, ACTH, immunosuppressants or lithium are not allowed
- Serum creatinine concentration \>200 μmol/L (adjusted for age and weight)
- Urine dipstick or microscopic findings suggestive of significant renal or other disease.
- Hematuria should be evaluated, the etiology established/documented, and treatment rendered as appropriate prior to entry
- +16 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cardiovascular Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Schiffrin EL, Park JB, Intengan HD, Touyz RM. Correction of arterial structure and endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension by the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan. Circulation. 2000 Apr 11;101(14):1653-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.14.1653.
PMID: 10758046BACKGROUNDPark JB, Intengan HD, Schiffrin EL. Reduction of resistance artery stiffness by treatment with the AT(1)-receptor antagonist losartan in essential hypertension. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2000 Mar;1(1):40-5. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2000.009.
PMID: 11967798BACKGROUNDSchiffrin EL, Park JB, Pu Q. Effect of crossing over hypertensive patients from a beta-blocker to an angiotensin receptor antagonist on resistance artery structure and on endothelial function. J Hypertens. 2002 Jan;20(1):71-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200201000-00011.
PMID: 11791028BACKGROUNDSavoia C, Touyz RM, Endemann DH, Pu Q, Ko EA, De Ciuceis C, Schiffrin EL. Angiotensin receptor blocker added to previous antihypertensive agents on arteries of diabetic hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2006 Aug;48(2):271-7. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000230234.84356.36. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
PMID: 16785331BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD, PhD
Physician-Chief, SMBD - Jewish General Hospital & Professor of Medicine, McGill University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician-in-Chief
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2006
First Posted
October 16, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05