A Randomized Trial Comparing SpineJet® Hydrodiscectomy to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Disc Herniation
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare a standard surgical procedure, open surgical microdiscectomy, used primarily to relieve leg pain and repair disc herniation to a newer surgical procedure, hydrodiscectomy with Spinejet®. The study will examine how well each procedure reduces subject pain and disability over a one-year period. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-use of a magnetic field to produce an image) of the lower spinal column taken before and after surgery will also be looked at to determine what physical changes have taken place over the course of a year. Subjects enrolled in this study will also be asked to keep track of their medical expenses related to treating their back pain to see if the surgeries being compared reduce out of pocket expenses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2006
CompletedJune 5, 2009
June 1, 2009
October 2, 2006
June 4, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain reduction
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient ages 18-75, both sexes
- Posterolateral single lumbar contained disc herniation, any level, up to 1/3 of spinal canal sagittal diameter, concordant radicular pain +/- back pain, and MRI confirmed nerve root contact/compression
- Failed trial of at least one NSAID within 6 months
- Failed at least 2 weeks physical therapy within 6 months
- Failed at least 2 epidural steroid injection (ESIs), no less than 2 weeks apart within 6 months
- Initial or recurrent episode of radiculitis
- Willingness to sign IRB-approved consent
You may not qualify if:
- Strength \< 4/5 in major muscle group of ipsilateral lower extremity
- Large extruded or sequestered HNP
- Greater than mild central canal, lateral recess, or neuroforamenal stenosis
- Previous surgery at affected level
- Other level lumbar HNP on affected side
- Significant (\>50%) loss of disc height compared to the adjacent higher level
- Local infection at needle insertion site
- Epidural extravasation on discography
- Pregnancy
- ASA status IV/V
- Diseases transmitted by blood
- Any illness, condition, or medication that would make a patient unsuitable for a surgical procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pinnacle Pain Medicinelead
- HydroCision, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Pinnacle Anesthesia Consultants, P.A. d.b.a. Pinnacle Pain Medicine
Dallas, Texas, 75240, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffery Wasserman, M.D.
Pinnacle Pain Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2006
First Posted
October 4, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Last Updated
June 5, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-06