Robotic Assisted Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients
VA ROBOTICS
CSP #558 - Robotic Assisted Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
127
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study will compare robotic training with usual care and intensive comparison therapy to attempt to improve upper extremity function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 stroke
Started Dec 2005
Typical duration for phase_2 stroke
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 13, 2014
CompletedJanuary 13, 2014
December 1, 2013
3.6 years
September 5, 2006
September 4, 2013
December 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Motor Recovery (FM) Scale
Fugl-Meyer (FM) is a standard instrument for the quantitative clinical assessment of motor impairment and function. In this study the upper extremity subsection of the FM was used. The FM assesses several impairment dimensions by using a 3 point ordinal scale: 0 = cannot perform, 1 = can perform partially and 2 = can perform fully. These measures are summed to an overall score is Scoring for upper extremity FM ranges from 0 (worst, completely plegic) to 66 (best, normal). Higher scores indicate better functioning. Outcome measure is the change in the FM score at 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks relative to baseline.
6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks minus baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Stroke Impact Scale
6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks minus baseline
Wolf Motor Function Test
6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks minus baseline
Change in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 Weeks Relative to Baseline
12 weeks minus baseline
Change in the Modified Ashworth Scale for Spasticity at 12 Weeks Relative to Baseline
12 weeks minus baseline
Study Arms (3)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALRobot-Assisted Therapy - MIT-MANUS System
Arm 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntensive Comparison Therapy
Arm 3
OTHERUsual Care
Interventions
The MIT-MANUS robot consists of four modules to train the entire upper limb: module A: shoulder-elbow; module B: anti-gravity; module C: wrist, and module D: hand-unit. Training will be given for 12 weeks and is divided into 4 consecutive blocks, with 9 training sessions per block.
The intensive comparison therapy protocol being used in CSP#558 was developed and field-tested at the Burke Rehabilitation Hospital. It exposes the patient to the identical number of treatments, time, and intensity that robot treated patients will receive (12 weeks, 3 times per week). Therapy sessions can be conducted on back-to-back days if needed and on more than 3 days a week (with approval from the Study Chairman) over a treatment period of up to 14 weeks in order to complete the 36 treatment sessions. During each 1-hour session, subjects participate in therapy in four successive stages: 1) warm-up and assisted stretching; 2) active arm treatments; 3) goal-directed planar reaching, and 4) functionally based Neurodevelopment Techniques (NDT)/Bobath arm training (Bobath, 1979).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A single new focal unilateral stroke with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI) or CT scan that has occurred at least 6 months prior to enrollment.
- Age 18 years of age and older.
- Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score \>=7 or \<=38 (max 66). (These thresholds include neither hemiplegic nor fully recovered motor function in 14 muscles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.)
- Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (Mini-Mental Status Score of 22 and higher or interview for aphasic subjects).
- Willingness to avoid any new alternative arm rehabilitative approaches for the duration of the study.
- Written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- A fixed contracture in the affected limb that prevents movement along the entire dynamic range required by either robot-assisted or intensive comparison therapy.
- Joint pain that occurs within the range of motion required by the intervention protocols (intensive comparison therapy and robot-assisted therapy).
- Enrolled in or planning to enroll in another interventional research trial that involves the upper limbs using procedures proposed to enhance or limit the function of the upper extremity (such as adjuvant rehabilitation or Botox injections) during the 36 weeks of participation.
- Prior experience with robot-assisted therapy or intensive comparison therapy for the upper limb as described in this specific study.
- A complicating medical condition that would prevent completion of the trial.
- Unable to complete the nine-month study, e.g., extended planned vacation.
- Any other known pre-existing bone diseases that might increase the risk of bone fracture or other injury from intensive comparison therapy or robot-assisted therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516, United States
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
Gainesville, Florida, 32608, United States
VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Providence VA Medical Center
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908-4799, United States
VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98108, United States
Related Publications (4)
Lo AC, Guarino P, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT, Duncan PW, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Richards LG, Bravata DM, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Peduzzi P. Multicenter randomized trial of robot-assisted rehabilitation for chronic stroke: methods and entry characteristics for VA ROBOTICS. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Oct;23(8):775-83. doi: 10.1177/1545968309338195. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
PMID: 19541917RESULTLo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT Jr, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1772-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341. Epub 2010 Apr 16.
PMID: 20400552RESULTWagner TH, Lo AC, Peduzzi P, Bravata DM, Huang GD, Krebs HI, Ringer RJ, Federman DG, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Volpe BT, Bever CT, Duncan PW, Siroka A, Guarino PD. An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2630-2. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.606442. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
PMID: 21757677RESULTWittenberg GF, Richards LG, Jones-Lush LM, Roys SR, Gullapalli RP, Yang S, Guarino PD, Lo AC. Predictors and brain connectivity changes associated with arm motor function improvement from intensive practice in chronic stroke. F1000Res. 2016 Aug 31;5:2119. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8603.2. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28357039DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Peter Guarino, MPH, PhD, Director, WH-CSPCC
- Organization
- Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program, West Haven, CT
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Albert Lo, MD PhD
Providence VA Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2006
First Posted
September 7, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 13, 2014
Results First Posted
January 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-12