NCT00369967

Brief Summary

We hypothesize that using "quick start" initiation of the contraceptive vaginal ring in adolescents seeking birth control will improve compliance compared to traditional start. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing "quick start" to traditional start initiation of the contraceptive vaginal ring in adolescents seeking birth control. The primary study outcome is method continuation at 3, 6, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include abnormal bleeding, product satisfaction, and adverse events.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2006

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2006

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2007

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2010

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 22, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2006

Results QC Date

December 10, 2015

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

ContraceptionAdolescentsContraceptive vaginal ringQuick start

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Continuation With the Contraceptive Method

    Participants reporting continuation with contraceptive method at 3 months

    3 months

  • Method Continuation at 6 Months

    Participants reporting continuation of method at 6 months

    6 months

  • Method Continuation at 12 Months

    Participants reporting continuation with method at 12 months

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Pregnancy

    3,6, and 12 mo

  • Bleeding Profile

    3, 6, and 12 months

  • Patient Satisfaction

    3, 6, and 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Quick start

EXPERIMENTAL

Start contraceptive method (NuvaRing) day of enrollment

Drug: NuvaRing

Traditional start

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Start contraceptive method (NuvaRing) after next menses (per package insert)

Drug: NuvaRing

Interventions

Initiation of NuvaRing for contraception

Also known as: contraceptive vaginal ring
Quick startTraditional start

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 21 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Zibners A, Cromer BA, Hayes J. Comparison of continuation rates for hormonal contraception among adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1999 May;12(2):90-4. doi: 10.1016/s1083-3188(00)86633-4.

    PMID: 10326194BACKGROUND
  • Rosenberg M, Waugh MS. Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 2):276-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70718-0.

    PMID: 9988830BACKGROUND
  • van den Heuvel MW, van Bragt AJ, Alnabawy AK, Kaptein MC. Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2005 Sep;72(3):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.005.

    PMID: 16102549BACKGROUND
  • Rivera R, Cabral de Mello M, Johnson SL, Chandra-Mouli V. Contraception for adolescents: social, clinical and service-delivery considerations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Nov;75(2):149-63. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00371-x.

    PMID: 11684110BACKGROUND
  • Novak A, de la Loge C, Abetz L, van der Meulen EA. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing: an international study of user acceptability. Contraception. 2003 Mar;67(3):187-94. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00514-0.

    PMID: 12618252BACKGROUND
  • Oddsson K, Leifels-Fischer B, de Melo NR, Wiel-Masson D, Benedetto C, Verhoeven CH, Dieben TO. Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial. Contraception. 2005 Mar;71(3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.001.

    PMID: 15722066BACKGROUND
  • Westhoff C, Kerns J, Morroni C, Cushman LF, Tiezzi L, Murphy PA. Quick start: novel oral contraceptive initiation method. Contraception. 2002 Sep;66(3):141-5. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00351-7.

    PMID: 12384200BACKGROUND
  • Lara-Torre E, Schroeder B. Adolescent compliance and side effects with Quick Start initiation of oral contraceptive pills. Contraception. 2002 Aug;66(2):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00326-8.

    PMID: 12204779BACKGROUND
  • Westhoff C, Morroni C, Kerns J, Murphy PA. Bleeding patterns after immediate vs. conventional oral contraceptive initiation: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2003 Feb;79(2):322-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04680-0.

    PMID: 12568841BACKGROUND
  • Westhoff C, Osborne LM, Schafer JE, Morroni C. Bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of an oral compared with a vaginal hormonal contraceptive. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;106(1):89-96. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164483.13326.59.

    PMID: 15994622BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

NuvaRing

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nicole Karjane
Organization
VCUHS

Study Officials

  • Nicole W Karjane, MD

    Virginia Commonwealth University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2006

First Posted

August 30, 2006

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

July 1, 2010

Last Updated

July 22, 2016

Results First Posted

July 22, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Not planned.

Locations