Results Of Patient Rated Asthma Control Test In Comparison To Diary Card Data
Asthma Control Assessment Via ACT and DRC in Asthmatics Treated With Seretide (50/250) Over 12 Weeks
1 other identifier
interventional
221
1 country
32
Brief Summary
The majority of asthma patients are not well controlled, despite the availability of asthma medication that could effectively treat the disease. In this study uncontrolled patients who are steroid-naive or on low dose inhaled corticosteroids will be treated with Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone combination, SFC) 50/250 µg twice daily. The asthma control test (ACT) will be used to detect differences in the level of asthma control during treatment. The study aims to show a correlation between improvements of ACT und the level of asthma control which will be reached by the patients. The aim of the study is to show that most of symptomatic asthma patients can reach 'well controlled asthma' with SFC. We get information about ACT in daily practice and physicians are trained to use the asthma control test as a screening tool and for follow up of asthma management. Correlations are expected between the improvements in ACT, Quality of Life and asthma control according to the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) criteria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 asthma
Started May 2006
32 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 9, 2018
CompletedMarch 9, 2018
March 1, 2018
1.3 years
August 10, 2006
February 21, 2017
March 6, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12
A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score \>1 (Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and a morning peak flow \>= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which includes no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry), no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change are fulfilled. The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control.
Week 9 to Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12
Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6
Baseline (Viait 3) and Week 12
Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12
Week 12
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12
Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score
Week 12
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
SFC 50/250 mcg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received the combination product, fluticasone 250 microgram (mcg) plus salmeterol 50 mcg (SFC 50/250 mcg) for 12 weeks. Study treatment was received using DISKUS™ powder inhalers, one dose in morning and evening. Study medication was dispensed at visits 3, 4, and 5 for 30 days each. The participants were provided with salbutamol rescue medication if they developed acute asthmatic symptoms. This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol. Use of rescue medications was recorded in the participant's asthma diaries. Stable dosages of other concomitant medications were allowed if they had no impact on the outcome criteria.
Interventions
Participant received salmeterol/fluticasone combination 50/250 mcg using DISKUS™ powder inhalers.
This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol.
Participant received salmeterol and fluticasone using DISKUS™ powder inhalers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of asthma
- Reversibility \>12% after inhalation of 200 µg Salbutamol
- willingness and ability to complete daily record card on daily basis and to measure morning PEF on daily basis
- % compliance in diary card completion asthma control status: Uncontrolled based on the GOAL criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Change of asthma medication during the last 4 weeks
- Asthma exacerbation characterized by use of oral corticoids during the last 3 months Pretreatment with inhaled corticosteroids more than 500 mcg Beclometasondipropionat or equivalent per day or other controller therapy during the last 3 months
- upper or lower respiratory tract infection during the RUN-IN period moderate or severe asthma exacerbation during the RUN-IN period
- Non compliance with use of Discus, PEF-meter and incomplete diary card data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (32)
GSK Investigational Site
Erlangen, Bavaria, 91052, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Kaufbeuren, Bavaria, 87600, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Landsberg am Lech, Bavaria, 86899, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80335, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81677, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Rednitzhembach, Bavaria, 91126, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Uttenreuth, Bavaria, 91080, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97070, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Cottbus, Brandenburg, 03050, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Wedel, Hamburg, 22880, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Arolsen, Hesse, 34454, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Eschwege, Hesse, 37269, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Kassel, Hesse, 34117, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Kassel, Hesse, 34121, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Marburg, Hesse, 35037, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, 38100, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Buchholz, Lower Saxony, 21244, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30159, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30167, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Chemnitz, Saxony, 09126, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01099, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Geesthacht, Schleswig-Holstein, 21502, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Greiz, Thuringia, 07973, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Sonneberg, Thuringia, 96515, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10367, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10717, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10965, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12165, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12687, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 13187, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 13597, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22767, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2006
First Posted
August 15, 2006
Study Start
May 17, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2007
Study Completion
September 14, 2007
Last Updated
March 9, 2018
Results First Posted
March 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03