FloSeal Tubeless Exit Versus Cope Loop Nephrostomy Versus Fascial Stitch Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy
Prospective Randomized Trial of Floseal Tubeless Exit vs. Cope Loop Nephrostomy vs. Fascial Stitch Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The patient will be asked to participate in a research project designed to determine the best way to prevent bleeding and promote patient comfort after having kidney stones removed. Two standard methods for ending the surgery are being compared to a newer method. In one standard method, the patient will have a tube draining urine from the kidney after the procedure. This tube may also prevent bleeding from the kidney. In another standard method the patient will have a tube left internally that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and a stitch will be used to close the incision and deeper tissues in the back. In the third potential option, a tube would be left internally to drain urine from the kidney to the patient's bladder and the surgical site would be filled with a clot promoting agent (FloSeal) which is a FDA approved agent specifically formulated to stop bleeding during surgical procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 13, 2016
December 1, 2016
10.3 years
August 3, 2006
December 12, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine which method of treatment causes the least pain to the patient.
one month
Study Arms (3)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORFloseal
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORCope-Loop/Nephrostomy Tube
3
ACTIVE COMPARATORFascial Stitch
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has kidney stones that require treatment (tx) with percutaneous stone removal
- years of age or over
You may not qualify if:
- Patient mentally impaired, have a chronic pain syndrome or disorder, or any condition that might alter the sensation of pain
- Patient taking coumadin
- Pre-existing percutaneous nephrostomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Irvine Medical Center-Department of Urology
Orange, California, 92868, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael K Louie, MD
UC Irvine, Department of Urology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Chairman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2006
First Posted
August 4, 2006
Study Start
June 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12