Comparing Vasopressin and Adrenaline in Patients With Cardiac Arrest
PIVOT
A Randomised, Double-blinded Multi-centre Trial Comparing Vasopressin and Adrenaline in Patients With Cardiac Arrest at the Emergency Department. (Preadmission Intravenous Vasopressin, Adrenaline Outcome Trial: PIVOT vII)
1 other identifier
interventional
727
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The effectiveness of medications in cardiac arrest has been greatly debated and questioned. Historically intravenous adrenaline has been the drug of choice since 1906. There have been few formal evaluations to determine the value of adrenaline for cardiac arrest, and clinical trials have not been able to show any benefit with intravenous adrenaline (compared to placebo or no treatment) in the field. Thus the purpose of this study is to compare vasopressin and adrenaline in the treatment of cardiac arrest to answer the question whether there is an improvement in survival between vasopressin and adrenaline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Mar 2006
Typical duration for phase_3
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2011
CompletedMarch 17, 2017
February 1, 2017
2.8 years
July 30, 2006
August 3, 2010
February 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival to Hospital Discharge.
Survival to hospital discharge is defined as the patient leaving the hospital alive or survival to 30 days post cardiac arrest,whichever came first. This therefore measures the number of participants who was discharged alive or survived to 30 days post cardiac arrest, whichever came first.
at 30 days post arrest
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Neurological Status on Discharge or at 30 Days Post Arrest, if Not Discharged.
at 30 days post arrest
Neurological Status at 1 Year.
at 1 year post arrest
Return of Spontaneous Circulation.
during resuscitation
Survival to Admission.
No specific time frame. Survival to admission refers to sustained return of spontaneous circulation until admission and transfer of care to Intensive Care Units /wards
Study Arms (2)
Adrenaline
ACTIVE COMPARATORVasopressin
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
40 IU
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with cardiac arrest as confirmed by the absence of a pulse, unresponsiveness and apnea
- Age above 16 (Age 21 and above for CGH only)
You may not qualify if:
- Traumatic cardiac arrest
- Age 16 and below (Age 20 and below for CGH only)
- CPR is contraindicated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Singapore General Hospitallead
- National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singaporecollaborator
- Alexandra Hospitalcollaborator
- National University Hospital, Singaporecollaborator
- Changi General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074, Singapore
Alexandra Hospital
Singapore, 159964, Singapore
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, 529889, Singapore
Related Publications (1)
Ong ME, Tiah L, Leong BS, Tan EC, Ong VY, Tan EA, Poh BY, Pek PP, Chen Y. A randomised, double-blind, multi-centre trial comparing vasopressin and adrenaline in patients with cardiac arrest presenting to or in the Emergency Department. Resuscitation. 2012 Aug;83(8):953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
PMID: 22353644DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
As the study was conducted over a relatively long period, results may be affected by secular trends.Variations in post-resuscitation care can affect survival to discharge status and variations between institutions are difficult to account for.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- A/Prof Marcus Ong Eng Hock
- Organization
- Singapore General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus EH Ong, MBBS
Singapore General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2006
First Posted
August 1, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 17, 2017
Results First Posted
August 9, 2011
Record last verified: 2017-02