Maximizing the Efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Contingency Management
1 other identifier
interventional
205
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cognitive-behavioral coping skills therapy (CBT) is a widely used and recognized treatment that has been empirically validated for a range of substance use disorders, often with emergent effects and continuing improvement even after treatment ends. Treatment retention and compliance are associated with enhanced treatment outcomes in CBT. Contingency management (CM) also has very strong support and is associated with rapid, robust effects on targeted outcomes. Despite their many strengths, neither CBT nor CM is universally effective. It is now essential to seek strategies to maximize and extend the effectiveness of these two approaches and to better understand how these treatments exert their effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2010
CompletedSeptember 27, 2011
September 1, 2011
5.8 years
July 7, 2006
September 26, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self reported marijuana use (days of abstinence by week) and results of urine toxicology screens
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Economic analysis with use of PACC-SAT
12 weeks
Study Arms (4)
1
EXPERIMENTALmanualized delivery of CBT by trained clinicians
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORCBT with Contingency Management reinforcement for attendance and completing homework (CBT+CM/adherence)
3
EXPERIMENTALContingency Management for abstinence alone (CM/abstinence)
4
ACTIVE COMPARATORContingency Management integrated with CBT (CM/abstinence+CBT)
Interventions
Contingency Management for abstinence in addition to manualized CBT delivered by a trained clinician
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- year old marijuana dependent
- willing to sign consent
- no use of prescribed psychotropic drugs
- willing to give three individuals as contacts
- willing to accept randomization
- read and write English (third grade level)
You may not qualify if:
- unable to commit to 1 year follow up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
ASAP/1 Long Wharf
New Haven, Connecticut, 06512, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathleen Carroll, PhD
Yale University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2006
First Posted
July 11, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2004
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 27, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-09