A Comparison of Three Different Formulations of Prednisolone Acetate 1%
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Generic prednisolone acetate 1% is less effective than Pred Forte 1% or Econopred Plus 1%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 21, 2014
CompletedJune 3, 2015
March 1, 2014
9 years
June 26, 2006
December 24, 2013
June 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change in Flare at Resolution
2 months
Study Arms (3)
Pred Forte 1%
ACTIVE COMPARATORPred Forte 1% dosed four times daily decreasing to once daily over four weeks.
EconoPred Plus 1%
ACTIVE COMPARATOREconoPred Plus 1% dosed four times daily decreasing to once daily over four weeks.
Prednisolone Acetate 1%
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrednisolone Acetate 1% dosed four times daily decreasing to once daily over four weeks.
Interventions
Four drops daily decreasing to once daily over four weeks.
Prednisolone Acetate four times daily decreasing to once daily over four weeks.
Dosed four times daily decreasing to once daily over four weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be willing and able to provide written informed consent.
- Be able and willing to follow instructions on the use of the study medication and likely to complete the entire course of the study.
- Be male or female of any race at least 18 years of age.
- Have visually significant cataract or medically uncontrolled glaucoma for which they have elected to undergo surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to use of corticosteroids.
- Ocular disease other than glaucoma or ocular hypertension that would interfere with study parameters (such as: uveitis, ocular infection, or severe dry eye). Subjects with mild chronic blepharitis, age-related macular degeneration and background diabetic retinopathy may be enrolled at the discretion of the investigator.
- Laser or any other intraocular surgery within the past three months.
- Require use of ocular NSAID or systemic steroids.
- Have known allergy or sensitivity to the study medications or their components
- Have corneal abnormalities that would interfere with the ability to obtain an adequate laser flare measurement.
- Be concurrently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study or participation within the last 30 days in any investigational drug or device study.
- Be pregnant, nursing, planning a pregnancy, or be of childbearing potential and not using a reliable form of contraception (a woman is considered of childbearing potential unless she is postmenopausal, has had a uterus and/or both ovaries removed, or has had a bilateral tubal ligation).
- Have a situation or condition that in the investigator's opinion may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with participation in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IU Eye at Carmel
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290, United States
Related Publications (9)
Cantor LB. Ophthalmic generic drug approval process: implications for efficacy and safety. J Glaucoma. 1997 Oct;6(5):344-9. doi: 10.1097/00061198-199710000-00011. No abstract available.
PMID: 9327353BACKGROUNDStoughton RB. Are generic formulations equivalent to trade name topical glucocorticoids? Arch Dermatol. 1987 Oct;123(10):1312-4.
PMID: 3662563BACKGROUNDOlsen EA. A double-blind controlled comparison of generic and trade-name topical steroids using the vasoconstriction assay. Arch Dermatol. 1991 Feb;127(2):197-201.
PMID: 1990984BACKGROUNDCasale TB, Azzam SM, Miller RE, Oren J. Demonstration of therapeutic equivalence of generic and innovator beclomethasone in seasonal allergic rhinitis. SAR Study Group. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 May;82(5):435-41. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62717-2.
PMID: 10353573BACKGROUNDNell H, Louw CM, Cyster H, Williams Z, Bardin PG, Joubert JR. Therapeutic equivalence study of two formulations (innovator v. generic) of beclomethasone dipropionate in adult asthmatic patients. S Afr Med J. 2001 Jan;91(1):51-6.
PMID: 11236299BACKGROUNDApt L, Henrick A, Silverman LM. Patient compliance with use of topical ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Feb;87(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90145-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 434075BACKGROUNDHille K, Hans J, Manderscheid T, Spang S, Ruprecht KW. [Laser flare in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery]. Ophthalmologe. 2001 Jan;98(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s003470170199. German.
PMID: 11220271BACKGROUNDShah SM, Spalton DJ, Taylor JC. Correlations between laser flare measurements and anterior chamber protein concentrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Sep;33(10):2878-84.
PMID: 1526738BACKGROUNDFiscella RG, Gutta R, Goldstein DB, Viana MAG. Comparison of PredForte Brand to generic Prednisolone acette and loteprednol etabonate (lotemax) in a Rabbit Model of Inflammation. American Academy of Ophthalmology 2001 Annual Meeting, Poster 73 Session 2001.
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Louis B. Cantor
- Organization
- Indiana University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louis B Cantor, MD
IUPUI/Clarian
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2006
First Posted
June 27, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2002
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 3, 2015
Results First Posted
April 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03