Comparison of Central Venous Catheters With Silver Nanoparticles Versus Conventional Catheters
NanoAgCVC
A Parallel, Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Triple Lumen Central Venous Catheters Impregnated With Silver Nanoparticles (AgTive®) Versus Conventional Catheters in Intensive Care Unit Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
472
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bloodstream infections are common in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). The need of a central venous line increases the risk of bacteremia and central venous catheter (CVC) related infections. The use of catheters coated and/or impregnated with different antimicrobial agents has been proposed to reduce the risk of such infections. However, results obtained so far did not reach enough clinical relevance to consider these medicated catheters as a valid alternative to the conventional ones. The aim of this comparative randomized study is to assess the ability of recently developed silver ion-releasing central venous catheters in preventing associated infections in comparison with the conventional ones. Experimental groups are defined as follows:
- Group A: patients treated with standard, triple lumen, non medicated catheters
- Group B: patients treated with triple lumen catheters impregnated with silver nanoparticles
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jul 2006
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2008
CompletedMay 16, 2011
September 1, 2008
June 14, 2006
May 13, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary end-point is the difference in raw percentage occurrence of central venous catheter related infections (CVCRI) (on a patient basis) between groups A and B.
period during the ICU stay
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary end-point are the infection-free time and the probability of CVCRI as a function of multiple predictors.
period during the ICU stay
Study Arms (2)
A
PLACEBO COMPARATORin this arm conventional CVCs will be inserted
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup B will receive medicated silver nanoparticles CVC
Interventions
insertion of medicated silver nanoparticles CVC
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients will be eligible when insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) at a new site (subclavian or internal jugular) has to be planned for therapy or monitoring of at least 3-day duration.
You may not qualify if:
- Age below 18 years and all patients with a history of failed catheterization attempts or the need for catheterization at a site of previous surgery, skeletal deformity, or scarring.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCSC, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, ICU
Rome, Rome, 00168, Italy
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Massimo Antonelli, Prof
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2006
First Posted
June 16, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Study Completion
September 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 16, 2011
Record last verified: 2008-09