NCT00336297|Completed
Testing Methods of Screening for Woman Abuse in Health Care Settings.
Testing Screening Formats for Indicator-Based and Universal Screening Measurements in the Identification of Woman Abuse.
Loading search results
Testing Screening Formats for Indicator-Based and Universal Screening Measurements in the Identification of Woman Abuse.
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
2,000
1 country
7
Study Start
May 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
Not reported
Date not reportedStudy Completion
February 2005
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Recent reviews have identified the need for additional high quality exploratory and evaluative research to understand 1) the actual impact on all women of instituting mass screening procedures versus using indicator-based approaches to identifying woman abuse and 2) the extent to which early identification through screening -- either universal or indicator-based is effective in preventing or ameliorating important outcomes. This is a critical first step in developing a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) which examines the effectiveness of screening in preventing woman abuse, improving quality of life and other associated outcomes. This study prepares for the RCT by testing the optimal method of administration for the two screening instruments that will be used in the RCT. The administration formats are: computer-based screen, paper and pencil screen and face-to-face screen. They study will also determine recruitment rates.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
February 2005
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
February 2005
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
June 9, 2006
Actual (reported)June 13, 2006
Actual (reported)disclosure rates for past year exposure to intimate partner violence
participant satisfaction with completing the instruments
missing data
Cambridge Memorial Hospital - Emergency Department
Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Carlisle Medical Centre
Carlisle, Ontario, L0R 1H0, Canada
City of Hamilton Public Health and Community Services Department
Hamilton, Ontario, L8R 3L5, Canada
Hamilton Health Sciences Colposcopy Clinic
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3, Canada
Victoria Family Medical Centre
London, Ontario, N5Z 2C1, Canada
London Health Sciences - Victoria Hospital Clinic 5A
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
Norfolk General Hospital - Emergency Department
MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Jamieson E, Boyle M, McNutt LA, Worster A, Lent B, Webb M; McMaster Violence Against Women Research Group. Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Aug 2;296(5):530-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.5.530.
Harriet L MacMillan, MD, MSc
McMaster University
First Submitted
June 9, 2006
First Posted
June 13, 2006
Study Start
May 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Study Completion
February 2005
Date type not reportedGroup Empowerment of Battered Women as a Tool for Violence Prevention
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Simcoe, Ontario, N3Y 1T7, Canada
This date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Last Updated
November 29, 2006
Record last verified: 2005-02
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: