Efficacy and Tolerance of Nova22007 Versus Vehicle in Patients With Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC)
Phase II/III, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel Group, Dose Ranging, Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Tolerance of Nova22007 (Cyclosporine A [CSA] 0.05% & 0.1% Ophthalmic Cationic Emulsion) Versus Vehicle in Patients With VKC
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is:
- To assess the efficacy of Nova22007, a cyclosporine A (CsA), 0.05% and 0.1% versus vehicle in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) after a 4-week treatment period. The secondary objectives of this study are:
- To compare the safety and ocular tolerance of Nova22007 0.05% and 0.1%;
- To assess the long term safety and ocular tolerance of Nova22007 0.05% and 0.1%; and
- To assess the decrease in frequency of concomitant artificial tears use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 22, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 14, 2021
CompletedDecember 14, 2021
November 1, 2021
10 months
May 19, 2006
July 8, 2021
November 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall Rating of Subjective Symptoms of VKC in Period I
The primary criteria of the trial was the overall rating of subjective symptoms in ocular symptoms of VKC as compared to Baseline and assessed at Week 4 (Month 1) based on a five-point scale based on BenEzra trial (BenEzra 1986): 1. = Overall worsening of the subjective findings. 2. = No change in the symptoms. 3. = Slight improvement with the child still unable to participate in all normal daily activities. 4. = Marked improvement despite temporary mild itching or mucus discharge. 5. = Completely free of all symptoms.
Week 4
Overall Rating of Objective Symptoms of VKC in Period I
Overall rating of objective signs was to be assessed under the slit lamp by the Investigator and recorded on a five-point scale based on BenEzra trial (BenEzra 1986): 1. Intense congestion of conjunctival vessels, perilimbal injection, or corneal involvement with the papillary proliferations more extensive or similar to the situation recorded before treatment in at least one of the eyes. 2. The overall condition was assessed as better than before treatment in both eyes. 3. Total re-epithelialisation of the cornea although slight conjunctival and perilimbal hyperaemia and papillary proliferations remains in both eyes. 4. Only slight conjunctival hyperaemia without perilimbal injection or papillary proliferations in at least one eye 5. Both eyes were quiet with no papillary proliferations or conjunctival or perilimbal injection.
Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Mean Daily Number of Unpreserved Artificial Tears Instillations in Period I
Up to Month1
Ocular Tolerance in Period I
Up to Month1
Study Arms (3)
NOVA22007 0.05%
EXPERIMENTALfour times daily
NOVA22007 0.1%
EXPERIMENTALfour times daily
Vehicle
SHAM COMPARATORadministered four times daily
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least the two following signs, in at least one eye\* (the same eye should fulfill both criteria):
- Presence of giant papillae with a diameter ≥ 1 mm on the upper tarsal conjunctiva AND
- Superficial keratitis
- At least two of the following ocular symptoms with a score \> 2 in at least one eye\*: burning/stinging, tearing, itching, pain, sticky eyelids, foreign body sensation, mucus discharge, and photophobia.
- Hyperemia score equal to or greater than 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant corneal ulcer of infectious origin.
- Active ocular herpes
- Disease that could possibly interfere with the interpretation of the study results: active uveitis (defined by Tyndall score \> 0), previous history of ocular hypertension or glaucoma, or condition incompatible with the frequent assessments needed by the study.
- Active herpes.
- History of malignancy or a recurrence in the last 5 years.
- Abnormality of nasolacrimal drainage apparatus.
- Concomitant disease not stabilized within 1 month before Screening Visit (e.g. diabetes with glycemia out of range, trouble with thyroid secretions, etc.) or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study (e.g. current systemic infections), or condition incompatible with the frequent assessments needed by the study.
- Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the investigational medicinal products (IMP) or test products.
- Severe systemic allergy requiring systemic treatment at study entry.
- Female of childbearing potential.
- History of drug or alcohol addiction (\> 50g/day, 5 glasses alcohol/day).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Santen SASlead
Study Sites (1)
Groupe Hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard
Paris, 75018, France
Related Publications (1)
Leonardi A, Pisella PJ, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Amrane M, Ismail D, Doan S, Bremond-Gignac D. NOVATIVE: A Phase II/III, Multicenter, Double-masked, Randomized Study of Cyclosporine A 0.05% and 0.1% Ophthalmic Cationic Emulsion Versus Vehicle in Patients with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Ther. 2023 Dec;45(12):1284-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.09.022. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
PMID: 37872059DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- R&D Quality Manager
- Organization
- Santen Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David BenEzra, Pf
Haddassah University Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christophe Baudouin, Pf.
Hôpital des XV-XX 28 rue de Charenton 75012 Paris
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2006
First Posted
May 22, 2006
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Primary Completion
February 22, 2007
Last Updated
December 14, 2021
Results First Posted
December 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11