Comparison of an Easy to Read Advance Directive Versus a Standard Advance Directive
Effects of an Easy to Read Advance Directive on Acceptability, Knowledge, and Self-efficacy Compared to a Standard Advance Directive
5 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the acceptability, usefulness, self-efficacy and comprehension of an easy-to-read advance directive form versus a standard advance directive form written at a post graduate reading level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2004
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2006
CompletedApril 25, 2011
April 1, 2011
May 18, 2006
April 21, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Acceptability
self-efficacy
attitudes about the forms utility
comprehension
preference
Secondary Outcomes (1)
6 month outcomes included whether participant talked with their doctor about treatment wishes, talked to family, thought about treatment decisions, or filled out an advance directive
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over 50 years
- Primary physician in the General Medicine Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
- English- or Spanish-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Blind
- Deaf
- Delirious
- Demented
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)lead
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Related Publications (5)
Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):889-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241305.
PMID: 2000111BACKGROUNDOtt BB, Hardie TL. Readability of advance directive documents. Image J Nurs Sch. 1997 Spring;29(1):53-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1997.tb01140.x.
PMID: 9127541BACKGROUNDNolan MT. Could lack of clarity in written advance directives contribute to their ineffectiveness? A study of the content of written advance directives. Appl Nurs Res. 2003 Feb;16(1):65-9. doi: 10.1053/apnr.2003.50007.
PMID: 12624865BACKGROUNDJacobson TA, Thomas DM, Morton FJ, Offutt G, Shevlin J, Ray S. Use of a low-literacy patient education tool to enhance pneumococcal vaccination rates. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999 Aug 18;282(7):646-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.7.646.
PMID: 10517717BACKGROUNDKirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement U.S. Department of Education; 1993 http://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rebecca Sudore, MD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2006
First Posted
May 19, 2006
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Study Completion
July 1, 2005
Last Updated
April 25, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-04