Comparison of Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Remifentanil or Fentanyl for Major Dressing Changes in Burns
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During their hospitalization, burn patients frequently require dressing changes that may be painful. Deep analgesia and sedation are used but carry the risk of remnant somnolence and other effects of anesthesia such as dizziness and nausea/vomiting. All these side effects may delay refeeding after the procedure, ambulation and physical therapy. Drugs from the opioid class are used to relieve pain during these procedures. Morphine with its slow onset and remnant sedation is difficult to use in these patients. Pro-emetic properties and histamine liberating effects also make this drug non optimal for iterative procedures. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid with shorter onset and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, is the standard drug used in dressing changes in burn patients. It is metabolized by hepatic glucoconjugation. Remifentanil, a well known novel opioid, that has a unique metabolism independent from renal or hepatic functions, is metabolized by a non specific esterase. It has a very short half-life (3.5 minutes) and should therefore be administered as a continuous infusion. The investigators hypothesized that the use of remifentanil for daily burn dressing changes is associated with less pain during procedures and faster recovery. Studied patients will be the ones requiring iterative dressing change procedures under sedation. The primary endpoint will be the maximal pain during the procedure. Secondary endpoints will be: average pain during and after the procedure; subjective sensation of comfort; total amount of opioids received; times to feeding after the procedure and ambulation after the procedure; comfort of the procedure according to the nurses; mobilisation according to the physical therapist; and safety of the analgesia technique. The study will be conducted according to the recommendations of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) that have been endorsed by the Canadian Anaesthetists' Society (CAS). All patients who consent will fast for at least 6 hours before the procedure. The two following regimens will be compared: a bolus infusion of fentanyl, starting with 1 µg/kg, followed by 0.5 µg/kg as needed every 5 to 10 minutes versus continuous infusion of remifentanil adapted to ensure analgesia. The initial dose of remifentanil will be 0.1 µg/kg/min to be adjusted between 0.05 µg/kg/min and 2 µg/kg/min. To allow blinding during the study, patients will receive a double-blinded protocol with sham (normal saline) in one arm. In other words: for each procedure, the patient will always receive boluses, either of fentanyl or saline, and a perfusion, either of remifentanil or saline. According to power calculations, 30 patients will be necessary to achieve the primary end-points. The investigators plan to enroll 40 patients in the study to allow for some drop outs and to increase their statistical power.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2006
CompletedOctober 13, 2006
October 1, 2006
May 16, 2006
October 12, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
maximal pain during the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (10)
average pain during the procedure
average pain after the procedure
subjective sensation of comfort during the procedure
total amount of opioids administered
sedation after the procedure
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient requiring at least 2 major dressing changes less than 2 days apart under analgesia and sedation
- Patient able to provide written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient under 18 years old
- Patient over 85 years old
- Patient unable to give consent
- Patient with hepatic failure
- Patient with predictable or known difficult airway (grade 3 or 4) as determined by senior intensive care unit (ICU) or anesthesia staff
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2W1T8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Bracco, MD
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2006
First Posted
May 17, 2006
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Study Completion
September 1, 2006
Last Updated
October 13, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-10