Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Metformin or Sulfonylureas and Metformin
1 other identifier
interventional
466
4 countries
14
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare the effects of twice-daily exenatide plus oral antidiabetic (OAD) agents and twice-daily placebo plus OAD with respect to glycemic control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus
Started Jan 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2007
CompletedFebruary 23, 2015
January 1, 2015
1.2 years
May 9, 2006
February 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To test the hypothesis that exenatide (before morning and evening meals) produces a greater decrease in HbA1c than placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control taking metformin alone or metformin and sulfonylureas.
16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To compare exenatide and placebo groups with respect to: *safety and tolerability; *proportion of patients achieving HbA1c<=7%; *body weight; *incidence and rate of hypoglycemic events; *glucose measurements
16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Exenatide
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo lead-in; exenatide 5 mcg for 4 weeks; exenatide 10 mcg for 12 weeks
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo in volume equal to exenatide
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Treated with a stable dose of one of the following for at least 3 months prior to screening: \* \>=1000 mg/day immediate-release metformin; or metformin \>=1000 mg/day and sulfonylurea; or sulfonylurea/metformin combination therapy.
- HbA1c between 7.1% and 11.0%, inclusive.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \>21 kg/m\^2 and \<35 kg/m\^2.
You may not qualify if:
- Have participated in this study previously, or any other study using exenatide or GLP-1 analogs.
- Have participated in an interventional, medical, surgical, or pharmaceutical study within 30 days of screening.
- Have characteristics contraindicating metformin or sulfonylurea use.
- Have been treated with exogenous insulin for more than 1 week within the 3 months prior to screening.
- Have used drugs for weight loss within 1 month of screening.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
- Eli Lilly and Companycollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Research Site
Beijing, China
Research Site
Guangzhou, China
Research Site
Nanjing, China
Research Site
Shanghai, China
Research Site
Sichuan, China
Research Site
Chennai, India
Research Site
Mumbai, India
Research Site
Pune, India
Research Site
Seoul, South Korea
Research Site
Sungnam City, South Korea
Research Site
Chiayi City, Taiwan
Research Site
Taichung, Taiwan
Research Site
Tainan, Taiwan
Research Site
Taipei, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Fineman MS, Mace KF, Diamant M, Darsow T, Cirincione BB, Booker Porter TK, Kinninger LA, Trautmann ME. Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
PMID: 22236356DERIVEDGao Y, Yoon KH, Chuang LM, Mohan V, Ning G, Shah S, Jang HC, Wu TJ, Johns D, Northrup J, Brodows R. Efficacy and safety of exenatide in patients of Asian descent with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin or metformin and a sulphonylurea. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Jan;83(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.09.037. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
PMID: 19019476DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
James Malone, MD
Eli Lilly and Company
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2006
First Posted
May 11, 2006
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2007
Study Completion
April 1, 2007
Last Updated
February 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01